Excellent. I'll take a crack at applying the Android patch to work
with your changes.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
>
> On 27 May 2014, at 18:36, Daiwei Li wrote:
>>
>> BTW, any idea when your platform independent high DPI changes will
>> make it in (or be in a working sta
On 27 May 2014, at 18:36, Daiwei Li wrote:
>
> BTW, any idea when your platform independent high DPI changes will
> make it in (or be in a working state in the review)? I would love to
> try having Android scale using the platform independent code.
The patches are now in a working state. New ch
No, this is not a late April Fools. Thought I'd let the list know since this is
a relatively significant matter for Qt on iOS, especially for LGPL users.
See https://developer.apple.com/xcode/ - "iOS developers can now create dynamic
frameworks, just like on OS X."
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petr
> I would not be terribly upset if somebody that actually did work on the xcb
> plugin stepped up and took this one :)
I would not say that I know all parts of the XCB plugin (yet), but I guess I
feel comfortable enough to be the default
assignee if nobody else is volunteering.
Gatis.
___
On 19/05/14 15:39, "Ulf Hermann" wrote:
>> Please don't. quick1 is especially usefull on platforms without any
>>OpenGL.
>> And quick1 can be built without qtdeclarative. Most of the current
>> dependencies are optional, and even qtwebkit depending on qtdeclarative
>>is
>> artificial in qt.pro. q
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:38:23PM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
> I originally proposed a QtCS session for this, but I think instead I
> will try to talk to the QML maintainers outside of a session. If any
> said maintainers think it is worth a full session, please let me know.
>
there
Hi,
On Monday 02 June 2014 17:26:54 Massimo Callegari wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm totally aware that the wip/newapi branch of Qt3D is a work in progress,
> but today I tried to build it and discovered that it doesn't actually
> render on a viewport but instead it creates a txt log file with some
>
Hi all,
I have created a extension to Qt that allows for the creation of QObject
children without the use of Q_OBJECT and moc for Qt > 5.x.
The extension does not require any changes to the Qt library.
It allows for the creation of QObject instances at runtime and thus
on-the-fly which is useful
Oswald wrote:
> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
> isolated,
> when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing features of
> qml/quick? you
> should aim at bringing this into the qtdeclarative repository, possibly
> directly into one
> of the
Em ter 03 jun 2014, às 00:38:11, Ben Lau escreveu:
> Hi Thiago,
>
> Thank for your quick reply! I would like to give it a try. However, I got
> error after run qmake.
>
> Project WARNING: You should probably load(qt_build_config) first in svg.pro
> for svg, as the latter also load()s qt_module.
>
Hi Thiago,
Thank for your quick reply! I would like to give it a try. However, I got
error after run qmake.
Project WARNING: You should probably load(qt_build_config) first in svg.pro
for svg, as the latter also load()s qt_module.
Project MESSAGE: Not doing so may lead to qt_module.prf overridin
Hi,
I think this is related to a similar issue I've been running into. We
identified it to be related to the snapping of the ListView which makes it snap
to somewhere else then one would expect for the initial positioning.
In your example there seems to be an issue that you set snapMode to
Lis
Hi everyone,
I'm totally aware that the wip/newapi branch of Qt3D is a work in progress, but
today I tried to build it and discovered that it doesn't actually render on a
viewport but instead it creates a txt log file with some information. Any
example does the same.
Is this correct or is my sys
Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 23:51:07, Ben Lau escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to convert a QML scene into SVG but the QtSvg only support
> painter but not scene graph. Then I search from the Internet and found this
> library
>
> https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qquick-qtsvg/
>
> However, the last com
Hi all,
I would like to convert a QML scene into SVG but the QtSvg only support
painter but not scene graph. Then I search from the Internet and found this
library
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qquick-qtsvg/
However, the last commit is on Feb 2012. Is it usable to use now? Moreover,
anybody know t
Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 16:06:24, Samuel Gaist escreveu:
> On 2 juin 2014, at 16:01, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
> >> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
> >> isolated, when it's pretty clear that this
Sorry, just realised that something went really wobbly in that loop copy
and paste of mine, should be:
int x[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
for( auto i : x )
{
int bob = 0;
}
On 2 June 2014 13:27, William Hallatt wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Trying to set up a non-Qt project compat
On 2 juin 2014, at 16:01, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
>> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
>> isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing
>> features of qml/quick? you shoul
Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
> isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing
> features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the
> qtdeclarative repositor
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Jake Petroules wrote:
> On 2014-06-02, at 08:24 AM, Richard Moore wrote:
>
> On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the
>
On 2014-06-02, at 08:24 AM, Richard Moore wrote:
> On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann
> wrote:
>
> I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the class,
> comparison of different software versions.
>
> QVersionInfo
On Monday 2. June 2014 13.24.55 Richard Moore wrote:
> On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the
> >> class,
> >> comparison of different software versions.
Hi,
Is there a way to listen for a database updating. I have a program and I
want to know when the database change (for insert and update event). Any
suggestion is welcome. Thank you.
Regards
Olivier
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.or
On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of the class,
>> comparison of different software versions.
>>
>
> QVersionInformation was also proposed as a name in the code
On 2014-06-02, at 08:12 AM, Keith Gardner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann
> wrote:
> On Saturday 31. May 2014 15.02.49 Keith Gardner wrote:
> [...]
> > > And then you'd use: QVersion::compare(a, b, myCompare);
> > >
> > >
> > > Big +1 to everything. This approach should
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann
wrote:
> On Saturday 31. May 2014 15.02.49 Keith Gardner wrote:
> [...]
> > > And then you'd use: QVersion::compare(a, b, myCompare);
> > >
> > >
> > > Big +1 to everything. This approach should serve everyones' use cases;
> > > let's get this integr
On Monday, 2 June 2014 11:23:16 CEST, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: Replicant
>>
> sounds ok to me, though i wonder whether naming the technology as a
> whole "replicant" is such a good idea, given the strong connotation with
> android. maybe something
Hi everybody,
Trying to set up a non-Qt project compatible with C++11 and using GCC, but
QtCreator keeps highlighting C++11 syntax with messages such as "auto' is a
C++11 extension".
I am confident that my kits are set up correctly (building Qt applications
that use C++11 works fine). For the non
On Monday, June 2, 2014, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
wrote:
> > Are you aware of QxtRPCService as well?
> > http://libqxt.bitbucket.org/doc/0.6/qxtrpcservice.html
>
> André,
>
> Nope. Didn't know about that one. It is Signals only, not Properties and
> Slots as well, though. Thanks!
>
> Brett
> Are you aware of QxtRPCService as well?
> http://libqxt.bitbucket.org/doc/0.6/qxtrpcservice.html
André,
Nope. Didn't know about that one. It is Signals only, not Properties and
Slots as well, though. Thanks!
Brett
___
Development mailing list
Dev
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:14:34PM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
> I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: QQSM
>
this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing
features of qml/quick? you
Hi all!
According to current plans Qt 5.3.1 release will happen 17th June & branching
5.3.1 from stable (or from 5.3 if that exists already) Tue 10th June. At that
point all must have items should be in so that we could produce release
candidate packages from 5.3.1 branch immediately. So there
Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) schreef op 31-5-2014 00:57:
>
> I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: Replicant
>
> What is it?
> Replicant is a Qt library for Inter Process Communication (IPC). It is meant
> as an alternate to QtDBus, but with a very different usa
On Saturday 31. May 2014 15.02.49 Keith Gardner wrote:
[...]
> > And then you'd use: QVersion::compare(a, b, myCompare);
> >
> >
> > Big +1 to everything. This approach should serve everyones' use cases;
> > let's get this integration rolling.
>
> I can agree to that. I will have an update thi
34 matches
Mail list logo
