Re: [Development] Changing GLdouble typedef in src/opengl/qgl.h

2014-09-04 Thread Gunnar Sletta
On 03 Sep 2014, at 22:20, Fredrik Höglund fred...@kde.org wrote: On Wednesday 03 September 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday 03 September 2014 07:54:14 Saikrishna Arcot wrote: I should have mentioned that these libraries are using Qt 4, and it would be non-trivial to change them to

Re: [Development] iOS Qt 5.3 CI broken

2014-09-04 Thread Knoll Lars
On 04/09/14 03:19, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: On 2014-09-03, at 07:58 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Could someone either fix it or disable iOS builds in the CI for 5.3?

Re: [Development] [Interest] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: get english translation)

2014-09-04 Thread Knoll Lars
On 04/09/14 07:54, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Thursday 04 September 2014 05:24:38 Rutledge Shawn wrote: It doesn't necessarily occur to an English speaker to identify translatable strings and wrap them in tr(), either. It is some work already to try to support

Re: [Development] QTBUG-35892. QML XMLHttpRequest does not support the OPTIONS method.

2014-09-04 Thread Richard Moore
On 3 September 2014 20:25, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: How is it represented in HTML5? Just do it the same way. I'm a little unsure that I understood. Could you please clarify what did you mean by represented in HTML5? XMLHttpRequests have existed in JavaScript

Re: [Development] QTBUG-35892. QML XMLHttpRequest does not support the OPTIONS method.

2014-09-04 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Thursday 04 September 2014, Richard Moore wrote: On 3 September 2014 20:25, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: How is it represented in HTML5? Just do it the same way. I'm a little unsure that I understood. Could you please clarify what did you mean by

Re: [Development] QTBUG-35892. QML XMLHttpRequest does not support the OPTIONS method.

2014-09-04 Thread Richard Moore
On 4 September 2014 10:29, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote: On Thursday 04 September 2014, Richard Moore wrote: On 3 September 2014 20:25, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: How is it represented in HTML5? Just do it the same way. I'm a little

[Development] QTCREATORBUG-11516 and QTBUG-37119

2014-09-04 Thread Helmut Mülner
For several months now it is not possible to evaluate Javascript expressions in the QML-Debugger component of QtCreator, so we are back to console.log() debugging. This issue was reported end of February and has a P2 priority. But it looks like there is no progress in this case. Could

Re: [Development] [Interest] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: get english translation)

2014-09-04 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
-Original Message- From: development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: 3. september 2014 18:11 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development]

[Development] RCC XML and options

2014-09-04 Thread John M. Dlugosz
I posted this on the Qt forum, but it was suggested that I bring it to the mailing list instead. The original post is at http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/46927 I read the documentation on the Resource Compiler (rcc), and my interest is in building existing projects using standard

[Development] DockAreaWidget and QGLWidget update / repaint / paintEvent

2014-09-04 Thread Renaud
Hi All, I'm working on porting huge applications from Qt4(.7.2) to Qt5.(3.0). The applications use massively QGLWidget (and openGL). On Qt4, it works perfectly. On Qt5, I got some issues: 1/The applications have many mechanisms which start from MouseMoveEvent to updateGL() the QGLWidget

Re: [Development] [Interest] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: get english translation)

2014-09-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 04 September 2014 13:03:12 Saether Jan-Arve wrote: Somebody already suggested to embed it as a resource, isn't that good enough? As long as we also load it by default. We cannot depend on users loading the translation file from the resource system. Imagine an application that is

Re: [Development] iOS Qt 5.3 CI broken

2014-09-04 Thread Jake Petroules
On 2014-09-04, at 03:34 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote: On 04/09/14 03:19, Jake Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: On 2014-09-03, at 07:58 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Could someone either fix it or disable iOS builds in the CI for 5.3?

Re: [Development] RCC XML and options

2014-09-04 Thread André Pönitz
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:19:52PM +, John M. Dlugosz wrote: I read the documentation on the Resource Compiler (rcc), and my interest is in building existing projects using standard platform tools without qmake. [Out of curiosity, what are the standard platform tools in this case?] That

Re: [Development] [Interest] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: get english translation)

2014-09-04 Thread Andre Somers
On 4-9-2014 18:26, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Thursday 04 September 2014 13:03:12 Saether Jan-Arve wrote: Somebody already suggested to embed it as a resource, isn't that good enough? As long as we also load it by default. We cannot depend on users loading the translation file from the

Re: [Development] [Interest] Direct-lookup translation, even for English (was Re: get english translation)

2014-09-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 04 September 2014 20:31:49 Andre Somers wrote: That sounds rather short-sighted to me. It means that an inconsistency is introduced for no good reason at all. If you want to have something that works for English only, it would be rather trivial to write a free function like this:

Re: [Development] RCC XML and options

2014-09-04 Thread André Pönitz
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:46:04PM +, John M. Dlugosz wrote: On 9/4/2014 1:03 PM, André Pönitz apoenitz-at-t-online.de |Qt Dev mailing list/Qt| wrote: [Out of curiosity, what are the standard platform tools in this case?] MSBuild. Runs from automated build server, testing server, as

Re: [Development] RCC XML and options

2014-09-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 04 September 2014 20:03:24 André Pönitz wrote: That is, I’m adding logic to run rcc over a *.qrc file to produce a cpp file. First, I read about the -compress / -no-compress options. That is all or nothing for the entire translation unit. Is there an attribute in the XML