Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

Op 31/03/2016 om 06:04 schreef Thiago Macieira: On quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2016 00:10:48 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: The question is rather, the Qt creator that will be release in 2 years will maybe want to use these macros to auto complete signals/slots and properties. I would assume

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

On quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2016 00:10:48 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > The question is rather, the Qt creator that will be release in 2 years will > maybe want to use these macros to auto complete signals/slots and > properties. I would assume some people would still have a LTS version of Qt

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

+1 On 30.03.2016 11:18, Knoll Lars wrote: He isn’t yet? In that case, a big +1 from me :) Cheers, Lars From: Development > on behalf of Richard Moore

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2016, 12:39:58 CEST schrieb Thiago Macieira: > On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 21:35:55 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > > I am also wondering in which branch to push this. Should it go in Qt > > > > 5.6 > > > > LTS so newer Qt creator can benefit of it starting from Qt

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.7 Alpha released

Am 30.03.16 um 22:44 schrieb Thiago Macieira: > On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 22:24:30 PDT ekke wrote: >> hi, >> >> are there any news on Qt 5.7 Beta ? > Yes, see the minutes from yesterday's release meeting. It was posted to the > releasing mailing list. thx. wasn't aware of this only

[Development] Qt git 5.7 + MSYS2 + lrelease

Hi all, I have finally been able to produce the first qt5-git (5.7 branch) package with MSYS2, including libraries, executables, examples, tools and docs. For all the submodules except for qtscxml. I believe it is a very nice one-command automation for who doesn't want to bother with long and

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.7 Alpha released

On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 22:24:30 PDT ekke wrote: > hi, > > are there any news on Qt 5.7 Beta ? Yes, see the minutes from yesterday's release meeting. It was posted to the releasing mailing list. > is 2016-03-31 still valid ? No. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT)

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.7 Alpha released

hi, are there any news on Qt 5.7 Beta ? is 2016-03-31 still valid ? thx ekke Am 11.03.16 um 09:18 schrieb List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development: > > Hi all! > > > > Qt 5.7 Alpha release is out, see > http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/03/11/qt-5-7-alpha-released/ >

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 21:35:55 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > I am also wondering in which branch to push this. Should it go in Qt 5.6 > > > LTS so newer Qt creator can benefit of it starting from Qt 5.6.1? > > > > You've proposed it for dev, but I think it deserves at least 5.7.

Re: [Development] QThreadStorage and C++11

On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 22:23:35 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any plans to reimplement QThreadStorage via thread_local for > compilers which support it? I haven't investigated whether it's possible. Probably not. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT)

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2016, 08:58:48 CEST schrieb Thiago Macieira: > On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 16:08:52 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As I am working on porting qdoc using clang, this is yet another time a > > tool is using clang to get information about Qt code and Qt

[Development] QThreadStorage and C++11

Hello, Are there any plans to reimplement QThreadStorage via thread_local for compilers which support it? -- Regards, Konstantin ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches

I said: >>> That's pretty much exactly what >>> >>> $ git pull -r >>> >>> (a.k.a. --rebase) will do for you, automagically. It might not play >>> ideally with merges in all cases, but I'm guessing you don't have a >>> surfeit of those. To which: > Op 30/03/2016 om 19:09 schreef René J.V. Bertin:

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches

Op 30/03/2016 om 19:09 schreef René J.V. Bertin: On Wednesday March 30 2016 15:51:49 Welbourne Edward wrote: I met such a review tool once. It was actually horribly frustrating. I'd much sooner be using critic [0]. I am a regular user of KDE's Reviewboard. It's undoubtedly not ideal, but I

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

On Wednesday March 30 2016 15:51:49 Welbourne Edward wrote: > I met such a review tool once. > It was actually horribly frustrating. > I'd much sooner be using critic [0]. I am a regular user of KDE's Reviewboard. It's undoubtedly not ideal, but I find it more than powerful enough. > I'm

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

30.03.2016, 19:11, "Thiago Macieira" : > On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 17:00:20 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: >>  It also illustrates very nicely why I'll keep thinking that it'd be so much >>  easier if Qt had a review system to which you can upload the (possibly

Re: [Development] gerrit : pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?

On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 09:41:12 PDT Rolland Dudemaine wrote: > git checkout -b temp origin/5.7 > git cherry-pick first-commit-sha second-commit-sha (or just one of those) > git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/5.7 > git checkout 5.7 > git branch -D temp > > But git-gpush as Thiago

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 17:00:20 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: > It also illustrates very nicely why I'll keep thinking that it'd be so much > easier if Qt had a review system to which you can upload the (possibly > pruned) results of `git diff` (and download it again if needed). git

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 16:08:52 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > Hi, > > As I am working on porting qdoc using clang, this is yet another time a tool > is using clang to get information about Qt code and Qt meta macro (signals, > slots, properties, ...) > > This has been done before:

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

> Thanks for such a lengthy and detailed overview - I hope you had that > sitting around somewhere! :) heh - I touch-type at speed and have all of that in my head. I learned git under demanding circumstances, so learned it thorouhgly. > It also illustrates very nicely why I'll keep thinking that

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

On Wednesday March 30 2016 12:54:30 Welbourne Edward wrote: >René J.V. Bertin said: >> I've got a few things I'd like to put up for code review, which I've >> been putting off because I can only think of doing them either one by Hi, Thanks for such a lengthy and detailed overview - I hope you

[Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

Hi, As I am working on porting qdoc using clang, this is yet another time a tool is using clang to get information about Qt code and Qt meta macro (signals, slots, properties, ...) This has been done before: qtcreator's clang code model [1], moc-ng [2], kdevelop, ... In each case, we need to

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 11:47:14 AM CEST Marc Mutz wrote: > [...] > > > I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. > > +1 > > > Disclaimer: I work at KDAB with Volker. > > Same here. +1 for both. -- Milian Wolff | milian.wo...@kdab.com | Software Engineer KDAB

Re: [Development] gerrit : what went wrong (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

René J.V. Bertin said: > I'm not exactly familiar with using branches; I just tried to create > one, apply a patch, commit it and then push to gerrit. That was a bit > of a failure; the commit to my local branch was also applied to the > branch I thought I'd branched off, and the push to gerrit

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

René J.V. Bertin said: > I've got a few things I'd like to put up for code review, which I've > been putting off because I can only think of doing them either one by > one (carrying each to completion before moving on to the next) or by > using parallel working copies. Neither is what I'd call

Re: [Development] Compiling QT 5.7 Windows 64-bit

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:33:12AM -0300, Rafael Roquetto wrote: > If you ever switch to MSVC, sh.exe will trick qmake into generating > Unix makefiles > i wonder where you got that idea from ... ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

[...] > I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. +1 > Disclaimer: I work at KDAB with Volker. Same here. -- Marc Mutz | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

+1 for my side! Cheers, BogDan. On Wednesday 30 March 2016 09:18:36 Knoll Lars wrote: > He isn’t yet? In that case, a big +1 from me :) > > Cheers, > Lars > > From: Development >

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

He isn’t yet? In that case, a big +1 from me :) Cheers, Lars From: Development > on behalf of Richard Moore > Date: Wednesday

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

+1 On 30 March 2016 at 09:34, Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. Volker is one of > the > main authors of GammaRay, is very active in the Qt Automotive sphere where > he > leads up KDAB's contributions, and has touched

[Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

Hi All, I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. Volker is one of the main authors of GammaRay, is very active in the Qt Automotive sphere where he leads up KDAB's contributions, and has touched many parts all over Qt (including Qt 3D). His dashboard is at:

Re: [Development] gerrit : pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?

On Wednesday 30 March 2016 09:12:13 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-03-29, René J.V Bertin wrote: > > Can someone point me in the right direction, maybe to a tutorial of sorts > > that outlines how to do several code reviews from a single working copy? > > > > I'm not exactly

Re: [Development] gerrit : pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?

On 29/03/2016 23:52, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a few things I'd like to put up for code review, which I've been > putting off because I can only think of doing them either one by one > (carrying each to completion before moving on to the next) or by using > parallel working

Re: [Development] gerrit : pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?

On 2016-03-29, René J.V Bertin wrote: > Can someone point me in the right direction, maybe to a tutorial of sorts > that outlines how to do several code reviews from a single working copy? > > I'm not exactly familiar with using branches; I just tried to create one, >

Re: [Development] Compiling 5.6.0 with VS2015

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Sandy Martel > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 2:05 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Compiling 5.6.0 with VS2015 > > Anyone