Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Lars Knoll [2016-06-07 06:38:35 +]: > Ok, in this case a separate repo is maybe a better strategy. > WebKitQt (as Allan proposed) might be a good name in this case :) I don't want to start any bike-shedding here, but if there's a QtWebKit and a WebKitQt and those are *basically* different v

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Lars Knoll
On 06/06/16 17:40, "Konstantin Tokarev" wrote: > > >06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" : >> Hi Konstantin, >> >> I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes >> of course both source code and bug tracking) :) > >Thank you! > >> >> I don’t think it is a problem that

Re: [Development] Qt 5.7.0 rc packages for testing

2016-06-06 Thread Henry Skoglund
On 2016-06-06 15:27, Ronan Jouchet wrote: On 2016-06-03 18:40, Henry Skoglund wrote: Hi, just tested 5.7 RC on Ubuntu, looks good. (Also I see Qt Creator 4.01's project view has nicer icons.) Hi Henry. What do you mean? Could you be also affected by https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53844

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" : > Hi Konstantin, > > I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes > of course both source code and bug tracking) :) > > I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is > different from Qt WebKit in 5.6, this w

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" : > Hi Konstantin, > > I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes > of course both source code and bug tracking) :) Thank you! > > I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is > different from Qt WebKit i

[Development] Qt 5.6.1 packages available

2016-06-06 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all We have Qt5.6.1 packages available: Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/496/ Linux: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/444/ Mac: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/380/ Src: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/latest_src/ Please test the pac

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Lars Knoll
Hi Konstantin, I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes of course both source code and bug tracking) :) I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is different from Qt WebKit in 5.6, this would have evolved in any way due to changes in

Re: [Development] Qt 5.7.0 rc packages for testing

2016-06-06 Thread Ronan Jouchet
On 2016-06-03 18:40, Henry Skoglund wrote: Hi, just tested 5.7 RC on Ubuntu, looks good. > (Also I see Qt Creator 4.01's project view has nicer icons.) Hi Henry. What do you mean? Could you be also affected by https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53844 ? Good day. ___

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Saturday 04 June 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sábado, 4 de junho de 2016, às 22:20:14 BRT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > > 2. Is it OK to use "QtWebKit" name for this project, and if yes, how > > should it be versioned? > > > > Pros: > > * It is a drop-in replacement for QtWebKit, > > Pl

[Development] Documenting 3rd party license code (with SPDX?)

2016-06-06 Thread Kai Koehne
tl;dr: Does anyone have experience with SPDX? Qt modules contain quite some 3rd party code under various (permissible) licenses. We've been listening these in the documentation, but this is certainly improvable - while the list is (hopefully) comprehensive, it gives users little help in where th