* Lars Knoll [2016-06-07 06:38:35 +]:
> Ok, in this case a separate repo is maybe a better strategy.
> WebKitQt (as Allan proposed) might be a good name in this case :)
I don't want to start any bike-shedding here, but if there's a
QtWebKit and a WebKitQt and those are *basically* different v
On 06/06/16 17:40, "Konstantin Tokarev" wrote:
>
>
>06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" :
>> Hi Konstantin,
>>
>> I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes
>> of course both source code and bug tracking) :)
>
>Thank you!
>
>>
>> I don’t think it is a problem that
On 2016-06-06 15:27, Ronan Jouchet wrote:
On 2016-06-03 18:40, Henry Skoglund wrote:
Hi, just tested 5.7 RC on Ubuntu, looks good.
(Also I see Qt Creator 4.01's project view has nicer icons.)
Hi Henry.
What do you mean? Could you be also affected by
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53844
06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" :
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes
> of course both source code and bug tracking) :)
>
> I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is
> different from Qt WebKit in 5.6, this w
06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" :
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes
> of course both source code and bug tracking) :)
Thank you!
>
> I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is
> different from Qt WebKit i
Hi all
We have Qt5.6.1 packages available:
Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/496/
Linux: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/444/
Mac: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/380/
Src: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.1/latest_src/
Please test the pac
Hi Konstantin,
I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes of
course both source code and bug tracking) :)
I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is different
from Qt WebKit in 5.6, this would have evolved in any way due to changes in
On 2016-06-03 18:40, Henry Skoglund wrote:
Hi, just tested 5.7 RC on Ubuntu, looks good.
> (Also I see Qt Creator 4.01's project view has nicer icons.)
Hi Henry.
What do you mean? Could you be also affected by
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53844 ?
Good day.
___
On Saturday 04 June 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em sábado, 4 de junho de 2016, às 22:20:14 BRT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu:
> > 2. Is it OK to use "QtWebKit" name for this project, and if yes, how
> > should it be versioned?
> >
> > Pros:
> > * It is a drop-in replacement for QtWebKit,
>
> Pl
tl;dr: Does anyone have experience with SPDX?
Qt modules contain quite some 3rd party code under various (permissible)
licenses. We've been listening these in the
documentation, but this is certainly improvable - while the list is (hopefully)
comprehensive, it gives users little help in where th
10 matches
Mail list logo