Quoting from another mail (haven't verified myself but rather reverted the
patch Thiago mentioned locally):
"Change https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/168922/ is required.
Unfortunately it's not yet in, apparently partly due to the gerrit troubles."
Maurice
> -Original Message-
>
On quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2016 18:33:24 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2016 18:22:14 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2016 18:16:08 PDT Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> > > Then I'm back at the prompt. There was no configuration.
On quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2016 18:22:14 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2016 18:16:08 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Then I'm back at the prompt. There was no configuration. There is no
> > mkspecs/ qconfig.pri and no mkspecs/qmodule.pri. Trying to compile
$ ls
configure.cache
$ cat configure.cache
-opensource
-developer-build
-nomake
tests
-nomake
examples
-confirm-license
-I
c:/OpenSSL-Win32/include/
-L
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> My previous guess about Qbs being able to generate unknown files in a
> particular location and then determine them by an 'ls' equivalent, moc
> them and compile everything is not something Qbs would be able to do.
I'm having trouble parsing this, but if you mean that
On Thursday 15 September 2016 14:51:26 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
[...]
> while playing around with Coverity Scan with a few colleagues of mine we
> noticed that only qtbase is getting uploaded and therefore checked
> (instead of the complete qt5.git).
>
> I'm fairly sure that this has changed
Howdy,
while playing around with Coverity Scan with a few colleagues of mine we
noticed that only qtbase is getting uploaded and therefore checked
(instead of the complete qt5.git).
I'm fairly sure that this has changed recently, as there are bugs in
there against other modules which were
On 15/09/16 08:57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:05:15PM +0200, Stephen Kelly via Development wrote:
I want to understand Qbs and what it can do with a dynamic build graph
which CMake can't do.
there is no such thing
Oh, I'm very surprised by that.
That also means
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:05:15PM +0200, Stephen Kelly via Development wrote:
> I want to understand Qbs and what it can do with a dynamic build graph
> which CMake can't do.
>
there is no such thing, as after full expansion the graph has to be
static by definition (the output artifacts are
