On 07/11/2017 06:36 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" :
Phil Bouchard wrote:
BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do
In fact, is it me or it would seem that:
- converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly
- compiling the resulting C++
On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to
simulate functions that return a function.
how to you cope with structures like:
function foo( outObject )
{
var object = {}
outObject.object = object
outObject.result
Noted.
My point was not to use openssl or external libs, i understand the security
issue of something that is not certified and audited.
Thank you
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 14:19 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On 2017-07-08 00:39, Matteo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just finished the first preview of my QAE
On 11 July 2017 at 22:13, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On 2017-07-08 00:39, Matteo wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just finished the first preview of my QAESEncryption class and I
>> would like to have some opinions on possible improvements, issues etc.
>>
>> https://github.com/bricke/Qt-AES [1]
>>
>> This is
On 2017-07-08 00:39, Matteo wrote:
Hi all,
I just finished the first preview of my QAESEncryption class and I
would like to have some opinions on possible improvements, issues etc.
https://github.com/bricke/Qt-AES [1]
This is still a work in progress but I feel it's good enough to be
shared an
On 11.07.2017 14:06, Timur Pocheptsov wrote:
I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. Among other
things Jesus is the author and the maintainer
of qtnetworkauth module, he is actively contributing to qtcore,
qtnetwork, qtwebsockets, qsql, etc. He is also
participating in the
Please file a bug report, thanks
On 11/07/2017 17:20, Nils Jeisecke via Development wrote:
Hi list,
while playing around with a recent build of dev
(82bdc55bc36f8a785e2637b01cb91d361b01fc29), I've noticed that toplevel
window transparency for QQuickWindow seems to have stopped working (at
least
Hi list,
while playing around with a recent build of dev
(82bdc55bc36f8a785e2637b01cb91d361b01fc29), I've noticed that toplevel
window transparency for QQuickWindow seems to have stopped working (at
least on macOS, haven't tried Windows so far).
Any "ApplicationWindow" with color: "transparent" s
+1
Awesome work on OAuth and WebGL!
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:06:46 +
Timur Pocheptsov wrote:
> I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. Among other things
> Jesus is the author and the maintainer
>
> of qtnetworkauth module, he is actively contributing to qtcore, qtnetwor
Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> bar shall be a global variable that is callable (i.e. somebody
> initialized it with a function closure). When invoked it shall return
> either a primitive value or a JavaScript object and takes one arbitrary
> parameter.
>
>
> It is an implementation detail whether i
Timur Pocheptsov (11 July 2017 14:06)
> I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status.
+1
Full disclosure: Timur, Jesus and I are all in TQtC's Core & Network team.
Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http:/
I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. Among other things
Jesus is the author and the maintainer
of qtnetworkauth module, he is actively contributing to qtcore, qtnetwork,
qtwebsockets, qsql, etc. He is also
participating in the development of the WebGL QPA plugin.
This is
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:25:21AM +, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's
> been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to
> him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and
>
bar shall be a global variable that is callable (i.e. somebody initialized it
with a function closure). When invoked it shall return either a primitive value
or a JavaScript object and takes one arbitrary parameter.
It is an implementation detail whether it returns the parameter provided, or
On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to
simulate functions that return a function.
how to you cope with structures like:
function foo( outObject )
{
var object = {}
outObject.object = object
outObject.result
On 2017-07-11 12:25, Simon Hausmann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year
he's been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my
experience talking to him and working with him, I trust him to review
changes thoroughly and approve or reject change
Hi,
I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's
been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to
him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and approve
or reject changes responsively.
Simon
___
10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" :
> Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do
>
> In fact, is it me or it would seem that:
> - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly
> - compiling the resulting C++ code
This approach would have abysmal perf
11.07.2017, 07:52, "Phil Bouchard" :
> On 07/10/2017 05:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
>>> Phil Bouchard wrote:
BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do
>>>
>>> In fact, is it me or it would seem t
Hi,
https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.6_Release talks about August as a potential time frame.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Kevin Kofler
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:24:40 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Timeframe for 5.6.3?
Hi,
Hi,
Is there a timeframe for the Qt 5.6.3 LTS release? Or is everyone expected
to move to 5.9 now? The last 5.6.x release was in October 2016, and
especially QtWebEngine has accumulated a lot of security fixes since then.
If it is still going to take a while, could we please at least have snaps
2017-07-08 21:16 GMT+02:00 Massimo Callegari via Development
:
>
> > The fact that something is a 'text' file does not make it different,
> > permissions make a difference.
>
> True, but this discussion moved specifically to Linux, while what I mentioned
> in the first place was Windows, which is
> On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to
> simulate functions that return a function.
how to you cope with structures like:
function foo( outObject )
{
var object = {}
outObject.object = object
outObject.result = function() { return object }
return fu
23 matches
Mail list logo