[Development] License issue with Qt3D files, aka QTBUG-61415

Some time ago I filed QTBUG-61415 because Qt3D ships files which require permissions from the author in order to be able to ship them. The bug has been marked as P1 but so far we have not seen any changes. I think this should be really fixed soon, as we are talking about 3rd party stuff licenses.

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

NM, I figured out how to cancel it :P On 03/15/2018 11:57 AM, Adam Treat wrote: Speaking of... https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/223224/ That integration is stuck and I don't know how to stop it and restage it. Apparently, the Windows 7 (mingw53-x86) VM crashed and COIN is not aware of

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

Speaking of... https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/223224/ That integration is stuck and I don't know how to stop it and restage it. Apparently, the Windows 7 (mingw53-x86) VM crashed and COIN is not aware of that due to these: 1. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-1750 2.

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

I would not regard this as excess spam at all. It is important to know when the CI is not available and what the status is. If a restart or scheduled update of any kind requires to restage commits for COIN, please include that info. On 03/15/2018 04:26 AM, Tony Sarajärvi wrote: Hi We’re

[Development] [Announce] Qt 5.11 beta2 released

Hi all, We have published Qt 5.11 beta2 today. As earlier you can get it via online installer. br, Jani ___ Announce mailing list annou...@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/announce

[Development] Qt 5.11 beta2 released

Hi all, We have published Qt 5.11 beta2 today. As earlier you can get it via online installer. Delta to beta1 attached. Please test the packages now & report all findings to Jira. Also make sure all release blockers can be found from release blocker list

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

On 15/03/2018, 10.33, "Development on behalf of Florian Bruhin" wrote: Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:26:21AM +, Tony Sarajärvi wrote: > How does this sound to you recipients of

[Development] Qt Contributors' Summit time, date and help needed

Hello, This years' Qt Contributors' Summit (QtCS) 2018 is going to be in Oslo in June 11th - 12th. Qt Contributors' Summit is an annual event open to anyone who has contributed toward the Qt project in the past year. Contributions can include code, helping on the forum, maintaining the wiki,

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

Morten Sørvig (14 March 2018 10:54) > (The alternative would be to wait it out - perhaps threading support will be > enabled and stable in all browsers before we get to merge wip/webassembly). >From recent discussion with a Firefox developer, I gather that browser vendors are generally trying to

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

I am personally quite excited about having a common standard for binaries on the web, that can be generated from C++ and I think there is a lot of potential and I am happy to see Qt going in that direction. Regarding the load-times: WebAssembly supports dynamic linking, so browsers might cache Qt

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:26:21AM +, Tony Sarajärvi wrote: > How does this sound to you recipients of these e-mails? Enough or would this > be excess spam to some degree? That sounds like useful information to me. However, I'm wondering: Would it be possible to display some kind of

[Development] About our CI update notifications

Hi We're trying to improve our communication toward you regarding our CI and what's going on with it. So our suggestion comes as follows: · - In case of a scheduled update, we send an e-mail to the public developer mailing list the day before · - In case of emergency update or

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready

Ok, Then it would be good to get this fixed in Qt 5.9.5. Please remember to do the cherry-pick in '5.9.5', not in '5.9' br, Jani From: Alexandr Akulich Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:03 AM To: Jani Heikkinen Cc:

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready

I thought that it is an old issue (since 5.9 to 5.11) but in fact, it is a regression since change [1] in landed to 5.9.5. I staged the fix for 5.11 ten minutes ago and I will submit the change for 5.9 in two hours. [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/212208/ On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:56

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/181112 > not sure why anyone would want to stop/block execution of the one and > only thread. sleep() and friends do have a place in single threaded applications. You can use them to do some backoff mechanism when waiting for an external event. You shouldn't