Re: [Development] Qt 5.12 new features

2018-08-17 Thread Jesus Fernandez
Fixed! WebGL plugin has no relevant changes for 5.12. Some stability & performance tweaks that are available also in 5.11.1. Thank you! Best regards, Jesús From: Development on behalf of Jason H Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 16:02 Cc: development@qt-pr

Re: [Development] What are new features of Qt3D in Qt 5.12?

2018-08-17 Thread Vincent Hui
According to https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.12, there will be no new features in Qt3D? I hope I am wrong. Thanks, Vincent On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 18:55, Robert Löhning wrote: > Am 27.07.2018 um 05:23 schrieb Brett Gilio: > > > > Vincent Hui writes:> > >> What are new features of Qt3D i

Re: [Development] unified data model API in QtCore => thin wrapper proposal

2018-08-17 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
> On 16 Aug 2018, at 22:11, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 06:05:35 PDT Arnaud Clère wrote: >> Hi, >> Thiago, did you decide on something regarding QCborValue in Qt5.12? > > Hello Arnaud, all > > No, I have not. I have not had the time to read your email yet and nor hav

Re: [Development] What are new features of Qt3D in Qt 5.12?

2018-08-17 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi, As stated the page is still under construction so don't worry; I think there is something new in qt3d side as well br, Jani From: Development on behalf of Vincent Hui Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 12:43 PM To: Robert Loehning Cc: development@qt-pro

Re: [Development] unified data model API in QtCore => thin wrapper proposal

2018-08-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 17 August 2018 02:50:32 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > Unless someone can volunteer to test. I *think* my design is slightly > > better than QJsonValue, so the following should work: > > > > value[1]["hello"][32] = false; > > That’s great news. I assume it’s also easy to convert from a

Re: [Development] unified data model API in QtCore => thin wrapper proposal

2018-08-17 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
> On 17 Aug 2018, at 17:08, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Friday, 17 August 2018 02:50:32 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: >>> Unless someone can volunteer to test. I *think* my design is slightly >>> better than QJsonValue, so the following should work: >>> >>> value[1]["hello"][32] = false; >> >>

[Development] HEADS UP: Branching from '5.11' to '5.11.2' started

2018-08-17 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi, We have soft branched '5.11.2' from '5.11' today. Target is to finalize branching Fri 24th August 2018. So please finalize ongoing changes in '5.11' and start using '5.11.2' for new changes targeted to Qt 5.11.2 release br, Jani ___ Development ma

Re: [Development] unified data model API in QtCore => thin wrapper proposal

2018-08-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 17 August 2018 08:13:21 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > Now, looking at the code, I don't think it does work. I thought that > > QCborValue::operator[] returned QCborValueRefs, but it doesn't. Adding a > > set of non-const overloads returning QCborValueRef might be the trick. > That would