Re: [Development] Any history on why "qtmultimedia5-private-dev" was removed.

2019-11-29 Thread Pier Luigi Fiorini
Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 08:44 Paul Knopf ha scritto: > I'm working on getting Debian 10 working for my Linux appliance/device and > our GUI uses Qt. > > Specifically, it uses "CONFIG+=multimedia-private". > > There seems to be a bunch of private Qt headers in the official repos, but >

Re: [Development] Removing overloaded signals in Qt6

2019-11-29 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development wrote: > > Hi, > > > The Qt5 PMF connect syntax is wonderful and very elegant compared to Qt > 4. > Unless, ofc, you have overloaded signals, which makes it painful to > write and read. Not even qOverload makes it look much better. > > >

Re: [Development] Any history on why "qtmultimedia5-private-dev" was removed.

2019-11-29 Thread Paul Knopf
Yeah, I understand the reasoning, because of lack of ABI compat with minor updates/patches, etc. However, our proprietary GUI needs it. I'll work on recompiling that module with private headers and deploy the deb within our own internal apt-feed. On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:04 AM Pier Luigi Fiorini

Re: [Development] Removing overloaded signals in Qt6

2019-11-29 Thread André Somers
Hi, On 29-11-19 09:15, Ville Voutilainen wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development wrote: Hi, The Qt5 PMF connect syntax is wonderful and very elegant compared to Qt 4. Unless, ofc, you have overloaded signals, which makes it painful to write and read. Not even qOve

Re: [Development] Nominating Cristian Adam as approver

2019-11-29 Thread Alex Blasche
Congratulations to Cristian. Approver rights have been set. -- Alex From: Development on behalf of Alessandro Portale Sent: Friday, 8 November 2019 21:35 To: Qt Development Subject: [Development] Nominating Cristian Adam as approver Hi, I like to prop

[Development] Removal of dead git submodules from qt5.git

2019-11-29 Thread Alex Blasche
Hi, I would like to remove some of the ancient submodules from qt5.git. They never were part of the Qt 5 offering anyway and mostly we were not sure whether we reactivate them. Considering that we never had a use through Qt 5's life time, I think it's time to remove them from the default setup.

Re: [Development] Removing overloaded signals in Qt6

2019-11-29 Thread Sérgio Martins via Development
On 2019-11-29 08:15, Ville Voutilainen wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development wrote: (...) I suggest we rename such signals, as KDE is already doing for KF6 (maybe leave the old signatures there, to reduce Qt6 SIC) There's also a new clazy check 'overloaded-signa

Re: [Development] Removing overloaded signals in Qt6

2019-11-29 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 12:21, Sérgio Martins wrote: > > On 2019-11-29 08:15, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development > > wrote: > > (...) > >> I suggest we rename such signals, as KDE is already doing for KF6 > >> (maybe > >> leave the old signatu

[Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 4.11 RC released

2019-11-29 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 4.11 RC! https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-creator-4.11-rc-released -- Eike Ziller Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Erich-Thilo-Straße 10 D-12489 Berlin eike.zil...@qt.io http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harj