Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

2020-03-02 Thread Paul Wicking
+1. Disclaimer: I'm guilty for convincing him to join the gerrit admin team :) Paul On 02/03/2020, 23:17, "Development on behalf of Andy Shaw" wrote: +1 from me too Andy -Original Message- From: Development on behalf of Volker Hilsheimer Date:

Re: [Development] QtWayland future

2020-03-02 Thread Pier Luigi Fiorini
Il giorno gio 27 feb 2020 alle ore 15:49 Tor Arne Vestbø < tor.arne.ves...@qt.io> ha scritto: > Hi Pier! > > First of all I’d like to strongly echo your thanks to Johan for his > amazing work on QtWayland! > > The module is important to us as well, and we’d like to see it continued. > As of now

Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

2020-03-02 Thread Andy Shaw
+1 from me too Andy -Original Message- From: Development on behalf of Volker Hilsheimer Date: Monday, 2 March 2020 at 17:42 To: "development@qt-project.org" Subject: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver Hi all, I’d like to nominate Daniel Smith as

Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

2020-03-02 Thread Timur Pocheptsov
+1. Best regards, Timur. From: Development on behalf of Tor Arne Vestbø Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:54 PM To: Volker Hilsheimer Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver +1 !! > On 2 Mar 2020, at

Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

2020-03-02 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
+1 !! > On 2 Mar 2020, at 17:40, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I’d like to nominate Daniel Smith as approver for the Qt Project. > > Daniel has been working with Qt since he joined the Qt Company as a full-time > employee in the Oslo QA team two years ago. > > He’s been

Re: [Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

2020-03-02 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 17:40, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I’d like to nominate Daniel Smith as approver for the Qt Project. +1 he’s been doing a great job on several fronts ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

[Development] Nominating Daniel Smith as approver

2020-03-02 Thread Volker Hilsheimer
Hi all, I’d like to nominate Daniel Smith as approver for the Qt Project. Daniel has been working with Qt since he joined the Qt Company as a full-time employee in the Oslo QA team two years ago. He’s been focusing on the QA infrastructure, which includes the test rigs for the rendering

Re: [Development] A modest proposal: disable lower-case keywords (emit, foreach, forever, signals, slots) by default

2020-03-02 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On 28 Feb 2020, at 21:33, Lars Knoll mailto:lars.kn...@qt.io>> wrote: So to shortcut this discussion a bit: I am completely opposed to a massive SIC changes/efforts for our signals (like giving them ugly names like emitClicked(), or signal objects). If people feel strongly, I am open to

Re: [Development] A modest proposal: disable lower-case keywords (emit, foreach, forever, signals, slots) by default

2020-03-02 Thread André Somers
On 02/03/2020 16:42, Matthew Woehlke wrote: On 28/02/2020 15.33, Lars Knoll wrote: This is all nice and fun to bike shed about, but I don’t think those proposed solutions match the scope of the original problem (which was relatively small). I don’t think a massive source compatibility breakage

Re: [Development] A modest proposal: disable lower-case keywords (emit, foreach, forever, signals, slots) by default

2020-03-02 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 28/02/2020 15.33, Lars Knoll wrote: > This is all nice and fun to bike shed about, but I don’t think those > proposed solutions match the scope of the original problem (which > was relatively small). I don’t think a massive source compatibility > breakage is what we want, just because there is