Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-11 Thread tasuku.suzuki
On 2012/06/12, at 4:20, ext Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 11 June 2012 09:21, João Abecasis wrote: >> Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >>> On 11 June 2012 00:49, wrote: Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it to feature list and fix the build. >>> >>> To

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-11 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 11 June 2012 09:21, João Abecasis wrote: > Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> On 11 June 2012 00:49,   wrote: >>> Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it >>> to feature list and fix the build. >> >> To be ultra pedantic, perhaps QT_NO_REGEXP should be renamed into >

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-11 Thread João Abecasis
Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 11 June 2012 00:49, wrote: >> Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it >> to feature list and fix the build. > > To be ultra pedantic, perhaps QT_NO_REGEXP should be renamed into > samething like QT_NO_REGULAREXPRESSION for selecti

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-10 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 11 June 2012 00:49, wrote: > Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it to > feature list and fix the build. To be ultra pedantic, perhaps QT_NO_REGEXP should be renamed into samething like QT_NO_REGULAREXPRESSION for selectively disabling PCRE+QRegularExpress

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-10 Thread tasuku.suzuki
Hi, I have fixed qconfig and QT_NO_FEATURE builds in Qt 4.6 and 4.7. I just started fixing them in Qt 5 a month ago. You can see some of them here [1]. As Thiago said, they are not supported and tested. But you are able to fix and use them if you really need to reduce the footprint. Disabling

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-10 Thread Brett Stottlemyer
> If I add the QT_NO_CURSOR flag, Qt5 won’t compile at all. I’m more concerned > about QT_NO_CURSOR not compiling for Qt5. Here is more detail on the compile errors I am getting: From the build log: cd src\gui\ && "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\BIN\nmake

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-08 Thread Brett Stottlemyer
>> I'm hitting the same issue the QT_NO_CURSOR. If I don't compile with this >> flag, apps crash because the cursor isn't built onto the device. QCursor >> has no constructor when compiled with QT_NO_CURSOR, but the QMetatype seems >> to assume it is there. That is QT_FOR_EACH_STATIC_CORE_CLA

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-08 Thread Jedrzej Nowacki
On Wednesday 6. June 2012 20.02.16 ext Brett Stottlemyer wrote: > I'm hitting the same issue the QT_NO_CURSOR. If I don't compile with this > flag, apps crash because the cursor isn't built onto the device. QCursor > has no constructor when compiled with QT_NO_CURSOR, but the QMetatype seems > to

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-06 Thread Brett Stottlemyer
>> And also, we find that so many feature flags can't be easily disabled >> for >> example: QT_NO_DATASTREAM etc., as it seems many codes are not fully >> controlled on some feature flag. So is that caused as the Qt5 code >> refine ?? > > Tasuku Suzuki has been trying to fix the feature system,

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 09.23.47, song.7@nokia.com wrote: > Not sure about the PCRE, but now I am trying the regx disabling, if it's > impossible or big efforts I will keep this feature in for my minimal-build. > > And also, we find that so many feature flags can't be easily disable

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-06 Thread song.7.liu
sday, June 06, 2012 5:17 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5 On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 08.44.22, song.7@nokia.com wrote: > Yes, we are creating a super minimal build with basic functionalities... > But is there some feature depending

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 08.44.22, song.7@nokia.com wrote: > Yes, we are creating a super minimal build with basic functionalities... > But is there some feature depending on the REGEXP in case if it's disabled > other features don't work then. There's probably nothing out there dep

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-06 Thread song.7.liu
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:34 PM To: Liu Song.7 (Nokia-MP/Beijing) Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5 Importance: High Hi, On 6 June 2012 02:42, wrote: > We are doing a customized build on qt5, but can I disable the pcre in qt5 ? it does not exact

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-06 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Hi, On 6 June 2012 02:42, wrote: > We are doing a customized build on qt5, but can I disable the pcre in qt5 ? it does not exactly work out of the box, but with little effort you should be able to define QT_NO_REGEXP (to avoid compiling QRegularExpression) and remove the PCRE inclusion from too

Re: [Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-05 Thread Girish Ramakrishnan
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:42 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are doing a customized build on qt5, but can I disable the pcre in qt5 ? > > No, it cannot be disabled. Qt will use either the system pcre or it's own pcre. It's required by QRegularExpression. Girish __

[Development] About pcre in qt5

2012-06-05 Thread song.7.liu
Hi, We are doing a customized build on qt5, but can I disable the pcre in qt5 ? Thanks, Song ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development