Hi all,
i'm currently in a project where i try to access a lazy C++ model from
within QML.
The basics are working well but when it comes to setting the
currentIndex it becomes a bit odd.
If i implemented everything well the lazy model always reports the
element count it currently has loaded b
whoops, missed reply-all
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Dominik Holland
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i'm currently in a project where i try to access a lazy C++ model from
>> within QML.
>>
>> The basics are working well bu
Hi,
On 03/05/2013 01:51 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> whoops, missed reply-all
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Dominik Holland
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i'm currently in a project where i try to access a lazy C++ mode
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Dominik Holland
wrote:
> Yes this makes sense and it's similar to my solution... But why do you
> need to multiply it with 0.9 ?
To start fetching (hopefully) before the data is really needed. Models
may involve asynchronous access (network etc) which might take a
On 03/05/2013 09:35 AM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Dominik Holland
> wrote:
>> Yes this makes sense and it's similar to my solution... But why do you
>> need to multiply it with 0.9 ?
> To start fetching (hopefully) before the data is really needed. Models
> may involv
On Monday, March 04, 2013 16:51:32 Alan Alpert wrote:
> > This is not a bug, ListView does not currently support canFetchMore
> > (which only claims to be used by QAbstractItemView, so the docs are
> > accurate already).
What a strange justification to not support canFetchMore. It boggles the mind
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Monday, March 04, 2013 16:51:32 Alan Alpert wrote:
>> > This is not a bug, ListView does not currently support canFetchMore
>> > (which only claims to be used by QAbstractItemView, so the docs are
>> > accurate already).
>
> What a strange