On 07/06/2012 02:40, Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2012 09:41:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Do we need to?
>>
>> I know the Gerrit control is a script that Sergio wrote one year ago. I
>> think we need a two-step solution:
>>
>> 1) make a command stream that has a "here, start testing thi
Op 7-6-2012 13:28, Peter Kümmel schreef:
> On 07.06.2012 08:35, Rohan McGovern wrote:
>> Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said:
It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
if you need to
On 07.06.2012 08:35, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said:
>>
>>> It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
>>> can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
>>> if you need to manage your own build nodes, there is curre
On Thursday 07 June 2012 10:50:12 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> Well, that is what we are doing already. The fact that Nokia CI runs Pulse
> and ours runs Bamboo, does not mean anything. It is the procedures and
> people that matter. And those we are sharing already.
Could you provide the Qt community w
On 7.6.2012 13.15, "Sean Harmer" wrote:
>On Thursday 07 June 2012 06:21:04 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
>> At Digia, Qt Commercial, we have our own CI & release test system which
>>is
>> based on an Atlassian tool called Bamboo. We have a much wider set of
>> platforms and configurations running than i
On Thursday 07 June 2012 06:21:04 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> At Digia, Qt Commercial, we have our own CI & release test system which is
> based on an Atlassian tool called Bamboo. We have a much wider set of
> platforms and configurations running than in the Nokia CI system, but we
> value very much t
On Thursday 07 June 2012 10:40:32 Sean Harmer wrote:
> I will file a JIRA task as Rohan suggested so that we can coordinate things
> there.
Done: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-532
Sean
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-p
On Thursday 07 June 2012 09:41:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Do we need to?
>
> I know the Gerrit control is a script that Sergio wrote one year ago. I
> think we need a two-step solution:
>
> 1) make a command stream that has a "here, start testing this". It can be
> something as simple as a publ
On quinta-feira, 7 de junho de 2012 05.53.01, daniel.molken...@nokia.com
wrote:
> How likely/far away is it that we can switch from Pulse to Jenkins for CI?
> Because in that case, we could federate CI builds.
>
> Given that the actual logic should be shell/perl/python scripts, this should
> be doa
On 6/7/12 8:35 AM, "ext Rohan McGovern" wrote:
>Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said:
>>
>> > It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
>> > can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
>> > if you need to manage your own build nodes, there
Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said:
>
> > It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
> > can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
> > if you need to manage your own build nodes, there is currently no way to
> > integrate with the Qt Proj
On 7.6.2012 1.33, "Rohan McGovern" wrote:
>Sean Harmer said:
>> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> > On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
>> > >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the
>> > >most
>> > >sensible way to go in term
> It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and
> can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So,
> if you need to manage your own build nodes, there is currently no way to
> integrate with the Qt Project CI system. Fixing this is a significant
> proj
Sean Harmer said:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> > On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
> > >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the
> > >most
> > >sensible way to go in terms of maintainability, reducing man-power at
> > >re
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
> >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the
> >most
> >sensible way to go in terms of maintainability, reducing man-power at
> >release
> >time and preventing i
On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote:
>On Wednesday 06 June 2012 13:22:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.46.18, Sean Harmer wrote:
>> > What other gates do we also have to pass to promote QNX to Tier 1?
>>
>> The major target is that, at release time, you'
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 13:22:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.46.18, Sean Harmer wrote:
> > What other gates do we also have to pass to promote QNX to Tier 1?
>
> The major target is that, at release time, you're able to confidently say
> that this platform is
On quarta-feira, 6 de junho de 2012 11.46.18, Sean Harmer wrote:
> What other gates do we also have to pass to promote QNX to Tier 1?
The major target is that, at release time, you're able to confidently say that
this platform is working properly and all the showstopper issues (as judged by
the re
Hi list,
We have been working hard to improve Qt support on the QNX platform. At this
stage we have good support for widgets and QtQuick 1 & 2, and sensors.
The next stage is to promote QNX to a Tier 1 platform so that users understand
that QNX is a fully supported platform for Qt.
To do so we
19 matches
Mail list logo
