Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-21 Thread cat fa
The make command in cygwin no longer support Dos-style pathname since make v3.81. Mingw-w64 needs to be shipped with mingw32-make in windows. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-21 Thread andy fillebrown
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:07 PM, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:33:54PM -0400, andy fillebrown wrote: Here are some attachments from a run using Creator 2.5 beta.  The project was built with the mingwbuild containing gcc 4.6.2 and gdb

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-21 Thread daniel.molkentin
On Apr 21, 2012, at 01:07 , ext André Pönitz wrote: This is https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTCREATORBUG-5200 There had been rumours that this was solved in (really) recent gdb builds like the ones that are intended to be shipped with Creator 2.5. In theory, these should

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-21 Thread andy fillebrown
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:38 AM, daniel.molken...@nokia.com wrote: On Apr 21, 2012, at 01:07 , ext André Pönitz wrote: This is    https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTCREATORBUG-5200 There had been rumours that this was solved in (really) recent gdb builds like the ones that are

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-21 Thread andy fillebrown
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:06 PM, andy fillebrown andy.fillebr...@gmail.com wrote: my bad, fixed: https://builds.qt-project.org/job/gdb-windows/53/artifact/build-creator-gdb-mingw/qtcreator-gdb-7.4-MINGW32_NT-6.1-i686.tar.gz This works well.  No breakpoint or callstack issues.  Unfortunately,

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread André Pönitz
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34:21PM -0400, andy fillebrown wrote: I would add to the proper compiler list the ability to set debug breakpoints quickly and proper display of call stacks across .dll boundaries. IMO those are the two things that bug me the most about the distros already

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread andy fillebrown
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34:21PM -0400, andy fillebrown wrote: I would add to the proper compiler list the ability to set debug breakpoints quickly and proper display of call stacks across .dll

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM, andy fillebrown andy.fillebr...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34:21PM -0400, andy fillebrown wrote: I would add to the proper compiler list the ability

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread marius.storm-olsen
Now wait a minute, I never said such a thing. I said that the MinGW-w64 binaries are Cygwin-based now. Meaning, the MinGW they release needs Cygwin DLLs to run. The output they generate is still native Win32 binaries, which does _not_ require Cygwin. (Anything else would be silly, since you

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread André Pönitz
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:19:50AM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM, andy fillebrown andy.fillebr...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34:21PM -0400,

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread andy fillebrown
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:07 AM, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:19:50AM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM, andy fillebrown andy.fillebr...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:01 AM, André Pönitz

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-20 Thread andy fillebrown
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:23 PM, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:08:01PM -0400, andy fillebrown wrote: [...] GCC 4.6.2 and 4.7.0 from mingwbuilds do not have the slow startup problem.  There are still two issues, though. I still don't

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-19 Thread Mark
2012/4/19 daniel.molken...@nokia.com Hi Everyone, ** ** After several complains from the community that GCC 4.4 shipped with both Creator and the Qt SDK is fairly outdated (and not C++11 compliant), we are going to ship a mingw.org-based GCC 4.6.2 with the next Qt Creator release.

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-19 Thread Richard Moore
2012/4/19 daniel.molken...@nokia.com: After several complains from the community that GCC 4.4 shipped with both Creator and the Qt SDK is fairly outdated (and not C++11 compliant), we are going to ship a mingw.org-based GCC 4.6.2 with the next Qt Creator release. Even though we verified that

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-19 Thread marius.storm-olsen
If you click the link in Daniels initial email, and onto the windows host directory, you would see that the have both the 4.7.0 release and the 4.7.1 prerelease as binaries already. -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 4/19/12 16:14 ext Mark wrote: 2012/4/19 daniel.molken...@nokia.com Hi Everyone,

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-19 Thread andy fillebrown
I would add to the proper compiler list the ability to set debug breakpoints quickly and proper display of call stacks across .dll boundaries. IMO those are the two things that bug me the most about the distros already mentioned. Waiting 2+ minutes for the debugger to start, and then not being

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-19 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 19/04/2012 17:06, ext 1+1=2 wrote: From the homepage of project, http://mingwbuilds.sourceforge.net/ This is the MinGW-builds project (mingwbuilds) This project was registered on SourceForge.net on Mar 30, 2012, and is described by the project team as follows: Snapshots and

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

2012-04-19 Thread 1+1=2
No, MinGW-w64 doesn't depend on Cygwin. http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Tip_Cross_Compiling_OpenFOAM_in_Linux_For_Windows_with_MinGW#Differences_between_mingw32_and_mingw-w32_versions Mingw-w64 began as a spin-off from the mingw.org project, with the original intent of building for 64-bit