The renamed, private, dynamic selector supporting version is now on
gerrit against stable: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,52605
for those following this change.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Thiago Macieira
On Monday, March 25, 2013 18:19:57 Alan Alpert wrote:
More time to iterate is always welcomed. This may lead to a
source-incompatible change in Plasma Packages though, ideally we'd
only do that once with the existing incompatible change of KDE
Frameworks 5. Would that be using the 5.1 or 5.2
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.42.27, Alan Alpert wrote:
This is not good enough a reason. Any new feature can only be accepted in
*dev* once it's complete: that is, it is there, works, unit-tested,
documented, with examples if necessary, and an initial API review has been
done.
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 18.19.57, Alan Alpert wrote:
tl;dr - Okay, let's make it private for 5.1 (also works for
BlackBerry) and aim to polish it for 5.2.
Maintainer agrees. Go for it.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.42.27, Alan Alpert wrote:
This is not good enough a reason. Any new feature can only be accepted in
*dev* once it's complete: that is, it is there, works, unit-tested,
Whoops, re-sending to dev...
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com
wrote:
On Monday, March 25, 2013 18:19:57 Alan Alpert wrote:
More time to iterate is always welcomed. This may lead to
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 14.57.11, Alan Alpert wrote:
There are a few questions left on the QFileSelectors API addition,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,48334 :
1) Did it miss the feature
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't it be a private API in 5.1?
That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that? That also provides
more flexibility while working towards unification.
If it goes in as private API, does it still fall subject to the
On Monday, March 25, 2013 10:46:37 Alan Alpert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't it be a private API in 5.1?
That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that? That also provides
more flexibility while working towards unification.
If it
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com wrote:
On Monday, March 25, 2013 10:46:37 Alan Alpert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't it be a private API in 5.1?
That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that? That
On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.37, Alan Alpert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't it be a private API in 5.1?
That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that? That also provides
more flexibility while working towards
tl;dr - This is a step in a good direction. I don't think it is usable as-is
for Plasma, but it could mature into such a thing. I'm unconvinced this is
ready for 5.1, particularly not as public API, but could be polished into
something shiny for 5.2
and now I will ramble on below ;)
(as I
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
tl;dr - This is a step in a good direction. I don't think it is usable as-is
for Plasma, but it could mature into such a thing. I'm unconvinced this is
ready for 5.1, particularly not as public API, but could be polished into
On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 14.57.11, Alan Alpert wrote:
There are a few questions left on the QFileSelectors API addition,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,48334 :
1) Did it miss the feature freeze for 5.1?
Technically, yes.
It did not merge into dev before the dev-stable
On 22 March 2013 21:57, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
In one of the patch sets, the form changed from f...@selector.png to
+selector/file.png . Feedback from designers in BlackBerry suggested
that they were more comfortable with directories, especially when
using it to swap out
Can't it be a private API in 5.1? In this case, I see no major reasons
to block it until 5.2.
Regards,
Konstantin
2013/3/23 Richard Moore r...@kde.org:
On 22 March 2013 21:57, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
In one of the patch sets, the form changed from f...@selector.png to
There are a few questions left on the QFileSelectors API addition,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,48334 :
1) Did it miss the feature freeze for 5.1?
It did not merge into dev before the dev-stable merge, so it has
technically missed the freeze. But I'd like to ask for a special
17 matches
Mail list logo
