On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 06:30:55 -02 André Hartmann wrote:
> > I personally use MSVC2017 together with MSVC2015 32 bit binaries for the
> > published product. But I regularly use MinGW for daily development.
> > Other people might prefer MinGW over MSVC for published products though.
> > So 32
Hi Jani and Roland,
First: Happy New Year to all!
Am 21.12.2017 um 11:59 schrieb Roland Winklmeier:
2017-12-21 11:37 GMT+01:00 Jani Heikkinen >:
With Qt 5.11 it seems we can finally drop MSVC2013 so we could
"temporarily" add MinGW
2017-12-21 11:37 GMT+01:00 Jani Heikkinen :
> With Qt 5.11 it seems we can finally drop MSVC2013 so we could
> "temporarily" add MinGW 64 bit pre-build binaries in our packages in
> addition to 32 bit ones and remove 32 bit MinGW pre-built binaries from
> 5.12 onwards.
Hi Jani,
+1 from my side for doing the move to 64bit MinGW in two steps.
Cheers,
Lars
> On 21 Dec 2017, at 11:37, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is open suggestion (https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-35288) to
> start delivering MinGW 64 bit pre-built
Hi all,
There is open suggestion (https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-35288) to start
delivering MinGW 64 bit pre-built binaries. This has been requested several
times in mails, blog comments etc. We have discussed this earlier, last time
with Qt 5.10 where I proposed that we could replace