On 11/23/2012 11:11 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Peter Hartmann wrote:
>> On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
>>> (...)
>>> The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
>>> practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based application typically test their
>>> setup against one specif
On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:20, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 11:11 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
>> Peter Hartmann wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
(...)
The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based app
> -Original Message-
> [mailto:development-bounces+tvaneerd=rim@qt-project.org] On Behalf
> Of Ziller Eike
>
> On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:20, Peter Hartmann wrote:
>
> >> Do you intend to upgrade this version of Qt that's installed on the
> device
> >> without upgrading the applications u
On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
> (...)
> The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
> practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based application typically test their
> setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which
> is then shipped with the applica
Peter Hartmann wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
> > (...)
> > The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
> > practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based application typically test their
> > setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which
>
On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:07 AM, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
>> (...)
>> The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
>> practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based application typically test their
>> setup against one specific (often enough patc
On 23 Nov 2012, at 14:15, Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>
> On 23 Nov 2012, at 11:07 AM, Peter Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
>>> (...)
>>> The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
>>> practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based application typicall
23.11.2012, 14:07, "Peter Hartmann" :
> This situation is different on mobile (and I guess embedded as well);
On embedded you usually can rebuild all software when changing Qt, so
binary compatibility is not important.
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Deve
