Ok i now finally also found /doc/src/legal/licenses.qdoc which is compiled into
qtdoc.qch
There i can find Copyright (C) 2004, 2005 Daniel M. Duley
under
Parts of the codecs implemented by Qt ( meaning TextCodecs)
But not for his code used in image scaling.
The thing that i am picking on that
On 2015-02-28, Gunnar Roth wrote:
>
> UC writes BSD Unix files not about general source code.
I don't think that UC has published anything else but BSD Unix.
> And why does gnu,org not update their website,but till insists on
> incompatibility with the GNU GPL?
In the general case, the incom
> Am 28.02.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Sune Vuorela :
>
>> Well https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html says
>> Original BSD license (#OriginalBSD)
>> This license is also sometimes called the “4-clause BSD license”.
>>
>> This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license with a s
> Well https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html says
> Original BSD license (#OriginalBSD)
> This license is also sometimes called the “4-clause BSD license”.
>
> This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license with a serious
> flaw: the “obnoxious BSD advertising clause”. Th
On Friday 27 February 2015 20:29:36 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> >> No need to mention
> >> in documentation, end-user license, to provide source code etc. that LGPL
> >> requires
> >
> > Because it's not LGPL requirement.
> >
> >
>
> What is NOT lpgl requirement?
"No need to mention in documentation,
___
> Lähettäjä: development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
>
> käyttäjän puolestaGunnar Roth
> Lähetetty: 27. helmikuuta 2015 20:40
> Vastaanottaja: Thiago Macieira
> Kopio: development@qt-project.org
> Aihe: Re: [Development] license question,
Hi Thiago
>
>> the requirement to document this is also more than qt company tells
>> commercial customers. they they if you use modules which are under
>> commrcial license as qtcore pretends to be, you can be silent about
>> anything used in there.
>
> There's a page in the Qt documentation t
Lähetetty: 27. helmikuuta 2015 20:40
Vastaanottaja: Thiago Macieira
Kopio: development@qt-project.org
Aihe: Re: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in
qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found
Hi Thiago,
should i just take your word or do you also have a link
On Friday 27 February 2015 19:40:51 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
> should i just take your word or do you also have a link for this?
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause-UC
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
> the requirement to document this is also more than qt
Hi Thiago,
should i just take your word or do you also have a link for this?
the requirement to document this is also more than qt company tells commercial
customers. they they if you use modules which are under commrcial license
as qtcore pretends to be, you can be silent about anything used in
On Friday 27 February 2015 08:40:21 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> is the so called adevrtising clause which is know to not be kompatible with
> GPL or LPGL, so how can it be that i find this kind of license in qt source
> code? What are the obligations to follow when using commercial license?
The Universit
mailto:development@qt-project.org>>
Subject: [Development] license question, bds 4 clause license text in
qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp qt5.4.1 found
Hi all,
i have a question according license compatibilty.
In qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp above line 601 in qt5.4.
Hi all,
i have a question according license compatibilty.
In qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp above line 601 in qt5.4.1 i found this:
\legalese
Copyright (c) 1989 The Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary f
13 matches
Mail list logo
