Re: [Development] qsizetype

On Thursday, 9 March 2023 05:08:48 PST Hasselmann Mathias via Development wrote: > My take on qsizetype: Just revert this failed experiment. It's a huge > annoyance for little to no benefit. I'll never understand how this very > broken and incomplete experiment could make it into Qt's main branch

[Development] Archiving of the '6.x' version in JIRA

Hey all, We’re planning on archiving the '6.x’ version in JIRA: https://bugreports.qt.io/projects/QTBUG/versions/18732 Now that Qt 6 has been out for a while, the version

Re: [Development] qsizetype

My take on qsizetype: Just revert this failed experiment. It's a huge annoyance for little to no benefit. I'll never understand how this very broken and incomplete experiment could make it into Qt's main branch at all. Am 13.09.2022 um 15:12 schrieb Volker Hilsheimer: On 12 Sep 2022, at

Re: [Development] qsizetype

On 9/3/23 10:14, Marc Mutz via Development wrote: On 08.03.23 15:30, Ahmad Samir wrote: So, named casts (static_cast) are better in such cases, as searching for them in source code is much easier than searching for: - int(foo) - (int)foo - (int)(foo) In which situation would you want to

[Development] [Announce] Qt 5.15.13 LTS Commercial released

Hi all, we have released Qt 5.15.13 LTS Commercial today. Please see the blog post: https://www.qt.io/blog/commercial-lts-qt-5.15.13-released The list of fixes and the overview of all important changes in Qt 5.15.13 can be found in the release note. It is available via Qt Account

Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in qt_attributions.json files

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Hasselmann Mathias via Development > Subject: Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in > qt_attributions.json files > > Hi, > > Just to make ensure all options are considered: How about the elephant in the >

Re: [Development] Security-relevant 3rd party components bundled with Qt

On 20.09.22 14:47, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: [...] > https://wiki.qt.io/Third_Party_Code_in_Qt [...] Sorry for being late to the discussion, but a wiki page will _always_ be stale. And it cannot answer the question differently for different branches. When we started using SPDX, I thought it was

Re: [Development] qsizetype

On 08.03.23 15:30, Ahmad Samir wrote: > So, named casts (static_cast) are better in such cases, as searching for > them in source code is much easier than searching for: > - int(foo) > - (int)foo > - (int)(foo) In which situation would you want to search for all casts in a piece of source code?