Hello Helmut,
that strange behaviour happens in my cases every time, when in
the lookup-form any outputs occur, something like an info, an debugprint,
or something like that.
are there any changes at this form ??
or is it standard ?
bxe,
SebDra
-Original Message-
From: HEW
Hello
Well i have a solution to this problem. This might not be technical one but
always work. What you can do is create two new tables, one of which is placed
before the corrupted table and other after. Select first new table and then
select second new table using shift so that the table
Hi!
Use the initValue method of the table.
Best regards,
Arpad Melega
From: RHODPR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:14 PM
To: development-axapta@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [development-axapta] setting default value
Hello:
I want to know how can to accessing information from a object common
buffer.
for example I need to access the information salesLine.salesId
storage in a buffer calling from updateReserveMore in a Class
InventUpd_reservation.
thanks.
Miguel Rommers
Yahoo!
Hi Sebastian,
Assuming you have a fresh backup of the table in question, there's a system
form - something like SysApplicationObject or similiar. In essence this form
lists each layer of each AOD-object in the system as one record. From here I
have been able to remove bad objects in the
helloo
apply the same service pack to all clients, and AOS -
Axapta Object Server and application
this error occurs due to mismatch between the service
packs at client and the AOS and / appliaction
regards
vaibhav pednekar
--- mchiat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've
I note that even axapd.aoi is not deleted in advance, when I
substitute the old axuser.aod with a new one(suppose there is no
table change between the two ones), the index is rebuilt ag(much
sooner than aoi deleted).So do I have to delete aoi before update
user layer? Thanks.
Dear all,
I have added a new checkbox to the form SalesEditLines.
CheckBox is named: printCertitificate, property AutoDeclaration =
yes, AllowEdit = No, Skip = yes
I made sure that several methods on the Class SalesFormLetter are
modified:
- ClassDeclaration: add printCertificate
-
Hi,
Is it possible to have 2 or more company account, 2 DB, and that 2 or
more company account has its own AOT (in that case different objects)
in 1 Axapta Application ?
for example I have installed my Axapta application, and then I
created :
- 1 DB for company A and 1 DB for company B
you need 2 folders under appl 1 for companyA 1 for companyB (you can
elect to use standard for one of the apps)
Pieter
_
From: anton_tjiptadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21. desember 2004 10:12
To: development-axapta@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [development-axapta] 2 different
Hi, Pieter, thanks for your quick reply.
could u explain it a little ?
did you mean, I must install a new appl ? if not, what files I
should move or prepare for that 2 folders ? and use standard,
what's that mean ? sorry I'm new here... :)
thanks a lot,
Anton
--- In
No, you don't have to, but the kernel will detect a new usr layer, and
thus it will rebuild it for you.
From: maipian_chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 8:40 PM
To: development-axapta@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Hi Jyoti,
thnx for your tip.
I would like not to implement the behaviour on the table (there is
validateField) I would like to implement it on the datasource.
Bye
Manfred
--- In development-axapta@yahoogroups.com, Jyoti Ranjan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manfred,
Why don't you
There's no way of dynamically changing an X++ select, but there is a
trick which can achieve the same effect, as long as you know in
advance what your possibilities are.
For instance, using your example below:
Declare a boolean for each possibility
boolean filterDim5;
boolean
Hi,
Maybe you are out of diskspace? Virtual memory ?
Is it 3-tier or 2-tier ?
/Stefan
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: jasondykeson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 20 december 2004 12:36
Till: development-axapta@yahoogroups.com
Ämne: [development-axapta] Axapd.aoi file
I'm back again - same problem. Posted before but didn't get any
replies. Figured I'd try again. Maybe I'll have to open a support
incident with MBS, but I'd rather not burn one of those unless I have
to.
Can't get thru the post-sync data upgrade step.
I get the following error:
Error
Yes, you can dynamically change the X++ select. It's possible to build dynamical functions aswell. I've done this a few times.
Try something like:
xppCompiler compiler = new xppCompiler();
str sql = 'void sql{select .}'
if(compiler.compile)
runbuf(sql);
Regards,
Morten
Hello all!
We are developing the eletronic bank reconciliation for eletronic
bills (using the standard classes) but, always we try to import the
return file from the bank (following for example the class
CustPaymReconciliationImport_DK_BS), the methods that update the
18 matches
Mail list logo