On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:12:59PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:14:25PM +, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:43:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Replace remaining 'Dumb' occurrences by 'Virtual'.
Remove inappropriate notes
Guys, trim your emails, please!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 03:12:38 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
I guess that would have to imply IRQF_SHARED, so we'd have something
like:
IRQF_SHARED_SUSPEND_OK - This handler is safe to
Please change the Subject to start with [PATCH] again when including
patches, otherwise its too easy for them to get lost. Esp. with
excessive quoting on top.
I nearly missed the patch here, seeing nothing in the first page of
text.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:13:13PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will be
called. The handlers requested without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will be skipped
as if they had immediately returned IRQF_NONE.
Cc: Boris Brezillon boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com
Cc: Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net
Cc: Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com
Cc: Peter
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP
+/**
+ * struct irq_chip_virt_demux - Dumb demultiplexer irq chip data structure
s/Dumb/Virtual/ ?
+ * @domain: irq domain pointer
+ * @available: Bitfield of valid
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:43:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Replace remaining 'Dumb' occurrences by 'Virtual'.
Remove inappropriate notes in kerneldoc headers.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com
Thanks, squished into the other one.
--
To unsubscribe from
-by: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe devicetree in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 02:55:10PM +0100, Mischa Jonker wrote:
Hi all,
Please find v3 of my attempt to add support for perf for ARC700 PMU's. If
possible, it would be nice to get some feedback on the implementation from
non-ARC/Synopsys people familiar with the perf subsystem in Linux.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:27:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 02:55:10PM +0100, Mischa Jonker wrote:
Hi all,
Please find v3 of my attempt to add support for perf for ARC700 PMU's. If
possible, it would be nice to get some feedback on the implementation from
