On Thu 30 Oct 06:34 PDT 2014, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Bjorn Andersson
> wrote:
> > My concern is that merging SMD into rpmsg will still give us two different
> > solutions, except that they will be deeply tangled.
>
> I agree.
>
> It's very clear
Hi Bjorn,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
> My concern is that merging SMD into rpmsg will still give us two different
> solutions, except that they will be deeply tangled.
I agree.
It's very clear that SMD and rpmsg are different. But fundamentally,
they do exactly the
On Wed 29 Oct 07:28 PDT 2014, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> [Thanks Kevin for the heads up on this]
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
Hi Ohad,
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Bjorn Andersson
> wrote:
> > == Codeaurora implementation ==
> > The codeaurora implementation originates from an implementation that was
[Thanks Kevin for the heads up on this]
Hi Bjorn,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
> == Codeaurora implementation ==
> The codeaurora implementation originates from an implementation that was
> based purely on initcall and global state
Do you refer to the in-tree arch/ar
On Thu 02 Oct 15:38 PDT 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/29/14 17:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > +
> > +#define GET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> > + (channel->rx_info_word ? \
> > + channel->rx_info_word->param : \
> > + channel->rx_info->param)
> > +
> > +#define GET
On 09/29/14 17:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> +
> +#define GET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> + (channel->rx_info_word ? \
> + channel->rx_info_word->param : \
> + channel->rx_info->param)
> +
> +#define GET_TX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> + (channel->rx_info_
This adds the Qualcomm Shared Memory Driver (SMD) providing
communication channels to remote processors, ontop of SMEM.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson
---
As we've already seen this is fuel for discussions, so I hope to start these
off by giving some insight in my research here.
== Codeaurora i
