Re: [RFC PATCH 09/11] DT: regulator: Helper to extract regulator node based on supply name

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:50:35PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > We've got two competing approaches here. For reg and interrupts, the > proposal on the table that we talked about at LPC is to do reg-names > and interrupts-names so as to preserve the existing semantics of the > reg and interrupts p

Re: [RFC PATCH 09/11] DT: regulator: Helper to extract regulator node based on supply name

2011-09-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:05PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > regulator = <®ulator1>,<®ulator2>; > > regulator-names = "supply1","supply2"; > > }; > > This syntax is really painful - we're relying on

Re: [RFC PATCH 06/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract fixed_voltage_config

2011-09-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:02PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > The helper routine defined here (of_get_fixed_voltage_config) can > be used to extract information about fixed regulators (which are not > software controlable) from device tree. > > Add documenation about additional bindings for fi

Re: [RFC PATCH 05/11] TWL: regulator: Make twl-regulator driver extract data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:01PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Modify the twl regulator driver to extract the regulator_init_data from > device tree when passed, instead of getting it through platform_data > structures (on non-DT builds) > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak > --- > drivers/regul

Re: [RFC PATCH 04/11] omap4: SDP: Pass regulator_init_data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:46:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:00PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible: Must be "regulator","ti,twl-reg"; > > I'd expect listings for the specific chips too. > > > + xyz-regulator: regulator@0

Re: [RFC PATCH 04/11] omap4: SDP: Pass regulator_init_data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:00PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Pass regulator_init_data information for omap4sdp from device tree so the > regulator driver can then use the regulator helper > routine to extract and use them during the driver probe(). > > Add documentation for TWL regulator spec

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-09-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:51:59PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > The helper routine is meant to be used by regulator drivers > to extract the regulator_init_data structure passed from device tree. > 'consumer_supplies' which is part of regulator_init_data is not extracted > as the regulator consum

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-09-15 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/15/2011 06:21 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > The helper routine is meant to be used by regulator drivers > to extract the regulator_init_data structure passed from device tree. > 'consumer_supplies' which is part of regulator_init_data is not extracted > as the regulator consumer mappings are pa

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-09-15 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/15/2011 08:44 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:51:59PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt| 37 + >> drivers/of/Kconfig |6 ++ >> drivers/of/Makefile

[PATCH] [v3] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards

2011-09-15 Thread Timur Tabi
Standarize and document the FPGA nodes used on Freescale QorIQ reference boards. There are different kinds of FPGAs used on the boards, but only two are currently standard: "pixis", "ngpixis", and "qixis". Although there are minor differences among the boards that have one kind of FPGA, most of t

Re: [PATCH] [v2] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards

2011-09-15 Thread Timur Tabi
Kumar Gala wrote: >> >compatible = "fsl,p3060qds-fpga", "fsl,fpga-qixis"; > Right, I pulled those bits out of your patch. I was hoping you'd notice that in v3 of my patch, I changed fsl,p3060qds-qixis to fsl,p3060qds-fpga. I think "fsl,p3060qds-qixis", "fsl,fpga-qixis"; looks kinda

Re: [PATCH] [v2] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards

2011-09-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Gala Kumar-B11780 wrote: >> I pulling the p3060qds bit out so drop that change from next patch. >> > > Ok, I'm thinking it should look like this: > > compatible = "fsl,p3060qds-fpga", "fsl,fpga-qixis"; Right, I pulled those bits out of y

Re: [PATCH] [v2] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards

2011-09-15 Thread Timur Tabi
Gala Kumar-B11780 wrote: > I pulling the p3060qds bit out so drop that change from next patch. > Ok, I'm thinking it should look like this: compatible = "fsl,p3060qds-fpga", "fsl,fpga-qixis"; -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale ___

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Rob Herring
Benoit, On 09/15/2011 08:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 9/15/2011 3:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> Benoit, >> >> On 09/15/2011 05:07 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On 9/15/2011 9:55 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Rob, On 14 September 2011 22:01, Rob Herring wrote:

Re: [PATCH] [v2] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards

2011-09-15 Thread Timur Tabi
Kumar Gala wrote: > What happened to looking at pixis vs ngpixis ? Doh, I knew I was forgetting something. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale ___ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.o

Re: [PATCH] [v2] powerpc/85xx: clean up FPGA device tree nodes for Freecsale QorIQ boards

2011-09-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 14, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Standarize and document the FPGA nodes used on Freescale QorIQ reference > boards. There are different kinds of FPGAs used on the boards, but > only two are currently standard: "pixis" and "qixis". Although there are > minor differences among the

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add device tree probe for i2c-imx driver

2011-09-15 Thread Ben Dooks
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:39:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Hopefully, you can pick up this version. ok, will do it for the weekend. > Thanks. > > Changes since v2: > * Drop HS-I2C from binding document fsl-imx-i2c.txt > > Changes since v1: > * Fix a couple of typo in fsl-imx-i

[PATCH v3 2/2] i2c-imx: add device tree probe support

2011-09-15 Thread Shawn Guo
It adds device tree probe support for i2c-imx driver. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo Cc: Grant Likely Cc: Darius Augulis Cc: Ben Dooks Acked-by: Grant Likely --- .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/fsl-imx-i2c.txt| 18 ++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 25

[PATCH v3 1/2] i2c-imx: remove init/exit hooks from platform data

2011-09-15 Thread Shawn Guo
The init/exit hooks in platform data are being used nowhere, so can be removed. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo Cc: Darius Augulis Cc: Ben Dooks Acked-by: Grant Likely Acked-by: Sascha Hauer --- arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/i2c.h |4 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 21 +++---

[PATCH v3 0/2] Add device tree probe for i2c-imx driver

2011-09-15 Thread Shawn Guo
Hi Ben, Hopefully, you can pick up this version. Thanks. Changes since v2: * Drop HS-I2C from binding document fsl-imx-i2c.txt Changes since v1: * Fix a couple of typo in fsl-imx-i2c.txt Shawn Guo (2): i2c-imx: remove init/exit hooks from platform data i2c-imx: add device tree pr

Re: [RFC PATCH 11/11] DT: regulator: register regulators as platform devices

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:07PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > of_regulator_register_devices() registers all regulators > as platform devices. Use this to register all twl regulators > from the twl driver probe. Regulators can be devices of any type, not just platform devices. > drivers/mfd/t

Re: [RFC PATCH 10/11] regulator: Implement consumer regulator mapping from device tree

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:06PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > + struct device_node *node; > + node = of_get_regulator(dev, id); > + if (!node) > + goto out; > + list_for_each_entry(rdev, ®ulator_list, list) > + if (node == rdev->node)

Re: [RFC PATCH 09/11] DT: regulator: Helper to extract regulator node based on supply name

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:05PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > regulator = <®ulator1>,<®ulator2>; > regulator-names = "supply1","supply2"; > }; This syntax is really painful - we're relying on keeping two arrays in sync which isn't good for legibility or robus

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 9/15/2011 3:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote: Benoit, On 09/15/2011 05:07 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: Hi Rob, On 9/15/2011 9:55 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Rob, On 14 September 2011 22:01, Rob Herring wrote: From: Rob Herring This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initializa

Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] regulator: Make fixed regulator driver extract data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:03PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Modify the fixed regulator driver to extract fixed_voltage_config from > device tree when passed, instead of getting it through platform_data > structures (on non-DT builds) The code you added in the previous patch should be part of

Re: [RFC PATCH 06/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract fixed_voltage_config

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:02PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt| 19 > drivers/of/of_regulator.c | 31 > > include/linux/of_regulator.h |7 > 3 file

Re: [PATCH 0/5] GIC OF bindings

2011-09-15 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:31:35AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > This series introduces of_irq_init to scan the device tree for interrupt > controller nodes and call their init functions in proper order. The GIC > init function is then called from this function. The platform c

Re: [RFC PATCH 04/11] omap4: SDP: Pass regulator_init_data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:00PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > +Required properties: > +- compatible: Must be "regulator","ti,twl-reg"; I'd expect listings for the specific chips too. > + xyz-regulator: regulator@0 { > + compatible = "regulator","ti,twl-reg"; > + t

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:51:59PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt| 37 + > drivers/of/Kconfig |6 ++ > drivers/of/Makefile|1 + > drivers/of/of_regulator.c

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/11] regulator: Fix error check in set_consumer_device_supply

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > The parameters to set_consumer_device_supply() can be considered > invalid (and hence it could return -EINVAL) if nether consumer_dev nor > consumer_dev_name are passed, not when *both* are passed. > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak

Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] OMAP: TWL: Clean up mode and ops mask passed from board files

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:51:57PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > The TWL driver seems to set the default .valid_modes_mask to > (REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL | REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY) and .valid_ops_mask > to (REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE | REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE | > REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS) > for all the re

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Rob Herring
Benoit, On 09/15/2011 05:07 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 9/15/2011 9:55 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> On 14 September 2011 22:01, Rob Herring wrote: >>> From: Rob Herring >>> >>> This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initialization >>> functions are

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 9/15/2011 2:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: The HW specs is obviously counting the IRQ number at the GIC interface. That offset is not known outside the MPUSS. Please have a look at the OMAP4430 TRM p4761 (NDA vM version)

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/15/2011 02:55 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 14 September 2011 22:01, Rob Herring wrote: >> From: Rob Herring >> >> This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initialization >> functions are intended to be called by a generic OF interrupt >> controller parsing fun

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > The HW specs is obviously counting the IRQ number at the GIC interface. > That offset is not known outside the MPUSS. Please have a look at the > OMAP4430 TRM p4761 (NDA vM version). As far as I know, I have no access to that. I

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 9/15/2011 12:29 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:07:25PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: On OMAP4 the SoC interrupts external to the MPU (SPI) have an offset of 32. Only the internal PPI are between 0 and 31. SGIs are 0 to 15, PPIs are 16 to 31, and SPIs are 32+

Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] picoxcell: add the DTS for the PC7302 board

2011-09-15 Thread Jamie Iles
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:32:02AM -0300, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:41 +0100, Jamie Iles wrote: > > > + chosen { > > + bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200 earlyprintk loglevel=9 > > root=ubi0:rootfs rw rootfstype=ubifs ubi.mtd=5,2048"; > > + linux

Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] picoxcell: add the DTS for the PC7302 board

2011-09-15 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:41 +0100, Jamie Iles wrote: > + chosen { > + bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200 earlyprintk loglevel=9 > root=ubi0:rootfs rw rootfstype=ubifs ubi.mtd=5,2048"; > + linux,stdout-path = &uart0; > + }; Hrm... we don't normally put the bootargs i

[RFC PATCH 01/11] OMAP: TWL: Clean up mode and ops mask passed from board files

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
The TWL driver seems to set the default .valid_modes_mask to (REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL | REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY) and .valid_ops_mask to (REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE | REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE | REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS) for all the registered regulators. There is no need for all the board files to pass this

[RFC PATCH 03/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
The helper routine is meant to be used by regulator drivers to extract the regulator_init_data structure passed from device tree. 'consumer_supplies' which is part of regulator_init_data is not extracted as the regulator consumer mappings are passed through DT differently, implemented in subsequent

[RFC PATCH 10/11] regulator: Implement consumer regulator mapping from device tree

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
With device tree, the consumer regulator mapping is deferred till a regulator_get is called from the corresponding device driver, instead of being done during regulator_register. This avoids a complete scan of all DT nodes to identify consumers for all regulators. Devices can assocaite with one or

[RFC PATCH 11/11] DT: regulator: register regulators as platform devices

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
of_regulator_register_devices() registers all regulators as platform devices. Use this to register all twl regulators from the twl driver probe. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak --- drivers/mfd/twl-core.c |3 +++ drivers/of/of_regulator.c| 30 ++ include/

[RFC PATCH 07/11] regulator: Make fixed regulator driver extract data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Modify the fixed regulator driver to extract fixed_voltage_config from device tree when passed, instead of getting it through platform_data structures (on non-DT builds) Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak --- drivers/regulator/fixed.c | 20 +++- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1

[RFC PATCH 04/11] omap4: SDP: Pass regulator_init_data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Pass regulator_init_data information for omap4sdp from device tree so the regulator driver can then use the regulator helper routine to extract and use them during the driver probe(). Add documentation for TWL regulator specific bindings. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak --- .../bindings/regulator

[RFC PATCH 08/11] omap4: panda: Pass fixed regulator data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Pass the fixed voltage regulator information for omap4panda board from device tree. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak --- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-

[RFC PATCH 06/11] DT: regulator: Helper routine to extract fixed_voltage_config

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
The helper routine defined here (of_get_fixed_voltage_config) can be used to extract information about fixed regulators (which are not software controlable) from device tree. Add documenation about additional bindings for fixed regulators that can be passed through DT. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nay

[RFC PATCH 05/11] TWL: regulator: Make twl-regulator driver extract data from DT

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Modify the twl regulator driver to extract the regulator_init_data from device tree when passed, instead of getting it through platform_data structures (on non-DT builds) Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak --- drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 28 +--- 1 files changed, 25

[RFC PATCH 00/11] Device tree support for regulators

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Hi Grant, Mark, This RFC is an attempt to move the regulator mappings from board files into device tree for OMAP. In the process I have defined some helper routines for regulators and defined the bindings for these. The patches are based on top of Benoit's series which adds DT support for i2c and

[RFC PATCH 02/11] regulator: Fix error check in set_consumer_device_supply

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
The parameters to set_consumer_device_supply() can be considered invalid (and hence it could return -EINVAL) if nether consumer_dev nor consumer_dev_name are passed, not when *both* are passed. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak --- drivers/regulator/core.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+)

[RFC PATCH 09/11] DT: regulator: Helper to extract regulator node based on supply name

2011-09-15 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Device nodes in DT can associate themselves with one or more regulators by providing a list of phandles (to regulator nodes) and corresponding supply names. For Example: devicenode: node@0x0 { ... ... regulator = <®ulator1>,<®ulator2>;

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 14 September 2011, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initialization > functions are intended to be called by a generic OF interrupt > controller parsing function once the right pieces are in place. > > PPIs are handle

Re: [PATCH 3/5] of/irq: introduce of_irq_init

2011-09-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 14 September 2011, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > of_irq_init will scan the devicetree for matching interrupt controller > nodes. Then it calls an initialization function for each found controller > in the proper order with parent nodes initialized before child nodes. >

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:07:25PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On OMAP4 the SoC interrupts external to the MPU (SPI) have an offset of > 32. Only the internal PPI are between 0 and 31. SGIs are 0 to 15, PPIs are 16 to 31, and SPIs are 32+ - that's the numbering given to us by the GIC. > The

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Cousson, Benoit
Hi Rob, On 9/15/2011 9:55 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Rob, On 14 September 2011 22:01, Rob Herring wrote: From: Rob Herring This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initialization functions are intended to be called by a generic OF interrupt controller parsing function once

Re: [PATCH 2/2] isp1760: Fix endianness-sensitivity in of_isp1760_probe()

2011-09-15 Thread Dave Martin
Hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:46:29AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:57:13PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: [...] > > + of_property_read_u32(dp, "bus-width", bus_width); > > Shouldn't this be '&bus_width'? On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:12:57PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

Re: [PATCH 0/5] GIC OF bindings

2011-09-15 Thread Jamie Iles
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:31:35AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > This series introduces of_irq_init to scan the device tree for interrupt > controller nodes and call their init functions in proper order. The GIC > init function is then called from this function. The platform c

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add Device Tree support to versatile-i2c driver

2011-09-15 Thread Ben Dooks
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:39AM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > This patch adds Device Tree binding ("arm,versatile-i2c") and > basic support (bus population) to versatile-i2c driver. what happens when !CONFIG_OF ? > Cc: Russell King > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ve

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Initial support for Picochip picoxcell

2011-09-15 Thread Jamie Iles
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:41:43PM +0100, Jamie Iles wrote: > This series adds support for Picochip picoXcell (PC3X2 and PC3X3) > ARM1176JZ-S based devices. This is a device tree only platform and > currently supports interrupt controllers and UARTs. > > This series is based off of Grant's device

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization

2011-09-15 Thread Thomas Abraham
Hi Rob, On 14 September 2011 22:01, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initialization > functions are intended to be called by a generic OF interrupt > controller parsing function once the right pieces are in place. > > PPIs are ha

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add device tree support for Samsung's I2C driver

2011-09-15 Thread Ben Dooks
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:46:03AM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > This patchset adds device tree support for Samsung's I2C driver. I've applied these after a brief review. I'll give them a better review before the weekend. ___ devicetree-discuss mailing