On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch converts the pinctrl-exynos driver to parse wakeup interrupt
> count and register offsets from device tree. It reduces the amount of
> static platform-specific data and facilitates adding further SoC
> variants to pinctrl-samsung dr
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Seuqential patches from this series introduce SoC-specific data parsing
> from device tree.
>
> This patch removes legacy GPIO bank nodes from exynos4210.dtsi and
> replaces them with nodes and properties required for these patches.
So to be
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Currently SoC-specific properties such as list of pin banks, register
> offsets and bitfield sizes are being taken from static data structures
> residing in pinctrl-exynos.c.
>
> This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to parse all SoC-
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to detect when width of a
> bit field is set to zero (which means that such configuraton type is not
> supported) and return an error instead of trying to modify an inexistent
> register.
>
> Sign
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Instead of registering one IRQ domain for all pin banks of a pin
> controller, this patch implements registration of per-bank domains.
>
> At a cost of a little memory overhead (~2.5KiB for all GPIO interrupts
> of Exynos4x12) it simplifies dr
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> The pointer to gpio_chip passed to pin_to_reg_bank utility function is
> used only to retrieve a pointer to samsung_pinctrl_drv_data structure.
>
> This patch modifies the function and its users to pass a pointer to
> samsung_pinctrl_drv_data
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to register one GPIO chip
> per pin bank, instead of a single chip for all pin banks of the
> controller.
>
> It simplifies GPIO accesses a lot (constant time instead of looping
> through the list
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of the
> pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts:
> - moving SoC-specific data to device tree
> - converting the driver to use one GPIO chip and one IRQ dom
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:26:51 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Seuqential patches from this series introduce SoC-specific data parsing
> > from device tree.
> >
> > This patch removes legacy GPIO bank nodes from exynos4210.dtsi and
> > repl
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:18:51 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch converts the pinctrl-exynos driver to parse wakeup interrupt
> > count and register offsets from device tree. It reduces the amount of
> > static platform-specific dat
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:37:42 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to detect when width of
> > a
> > bit field is set to zero (which means that such configuraton type is
> > not
> > supported) and r
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:34:05 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Currently SoC-specific properties such as list of pin banks, register
> > offsets and bitfield sizes are being taken from static data structures
> > residing in pinctrl-exynos.c.
Hi Guennadi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:58:58AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 05:41:00PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Hi Sascha
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Maybe the example would be clearer if you split it up
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:40:16 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Instead of registering one IRQ domain for all pin banks of a pin
> > controller, this patch implements registration of per-bank domains.
> >
> > At a cost of a little memory ove
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:43:25 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to register one GPIO
> > chip
> > per pin bank, instead of a single chip for all pin banks of the
> > controller.
> >
> > It simpl
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:40:06AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Mark, when do we get the same for aSoC? ;)
Well, I'm unlikely to work on it as I don't have any systems which can
boot with device tree.
The big, big problem you've got doing this is lots of dynamic changes at
runtime and in genera
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:42:10 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > The pointer to gpio_chip passed to pin_to_reg_bank utility function is
> > used only to retrieve a pointer to samsung_pinctrl_drv_data structure.
> >
> > This patch modifies the
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:46:28 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of
> > the>
> > pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts:
> > - moving SoC-specific data to
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >> On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> > On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> What more do
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:51:27PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:40:06AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > Mark, when do we get the same for aSoC? ;)
>
> Well, I'm unlikely to work on it as I don't have any systems which can
> boot with device tree.
If it's only that I'm s
This patchset is based on the work by Praveen Paneri for
samsung-usbphy driver:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12653
Changes from v1:
- squashed the patch "ARM: S3C64XX: Add phy_type to pmu_isolation" into
"usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support to samsung-phy driver
This patch adds host phy support to samsung-usbphy.c and
further adds support for samsung's exynos5250 usb-phy.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c |2 +-
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c|2 +-
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/usb-p
Adding usbphy node for Exynos5250 along with the platform data.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
.../devicetree/bindings/usb/samsung-usbphy.txt | 12 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |5 ++
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig |1 +
arch/arm/ma
Adding the transceiver to ehci driver. Keeping the platform data
for continuing the smooth operation for boards which still uses it
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-s5p.c | 65 +-
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
d
Adding the transceiver to ohci driver. Keeping the platform data
for continuing the smooth operation for boards which still uses it
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c | 65 +++
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
d
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:21:15AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:51:27PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Well, I'm unlikely to work on it as I don't have any systems which can
> > boot with device tree.
> If it's only that I'm sure we could spare a i.MX53 LOCO ;)
Well, som
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 17:04 +0100, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> Add support to parse the display configuration from device tree.
>
> If the board does not provide platform specific functions in the struct
> clcd_board contained with the amba device info, then defaults are provided
> by the driver.
>
> Th
Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 08 October 2012 14:23:25 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I think the soc_camera patches should be left out for now. I suspect that
> > by adding core support for async i2c handling first,
>
> Ok, let's think, what th
Hi Hans,
On Monday 08 October 2012 16:53:55 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Mon October 8 2012 16:30:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Mon October 8 2012 14:23:25 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > >
> > >
Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 08 October 2012 17:15:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Mon October 8 2012 16:30:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > On Mon October 8 2012 14:23:25 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
Hi Hans,
On Monday 08 October 2012 17:41:43 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Mon October 8 2012 17:15:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Mon October 8 2012 16:30:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote:
[snip]
> > >
Hi Hans,
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 13:00:24 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tue 9 October 2012 12:34:48 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 10/08/2012 11:40 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > >> I would really like to see more than one user until we add
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
> boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
> will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_mem_init() function,
> as gpmc cs0 gpmc_config7[0].csvalid bit i
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 19:30:27, Porter, Matt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> > With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
> > boot mode, where bootloader does not configure gpmc cs space
> > will result into kernel BUG() inside gpmc_me
On 10/09/2012 07:04 AM, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
> The first user of this function is the watchdog framework.
Who is the 2nd user because I don't see any others. I don't see this
being a widely used property.
Rob
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Cc: Rob Herring
> ---
> in
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 02:19:40PM +, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 19:30:27, Porter, Matt wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> > > With recent changes in omap gpmc driver code, in case of DT
> > > boot mode, where bootloader does no
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:35:01AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 02:19:40PM +, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 19:30:27, Porter, Matt wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> > > > With recent changes in omap gpmc
On Oct 10, 2012, at 1:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 12:39
Hi Mauro,
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 10:45:22 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:54 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > > Also, ideally OF-compatible (I2C) drivers should run with no platform
> > > data, but soc-camera is using I2C device platform data intensively. To
> > > a
Hi Mauro,
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 11:57:03 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:48 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > On Wednesday 10 October 2012 10:45:22 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:54 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > > > > Also, ideally
On 10/09/2012 06:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+cpp?
>> >>
>> >> How not to abuse the ever-lovin
On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon L
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:46:28 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of
> > the>
> > pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts:
> > - moving SoC-specific data to
On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>
On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Ste
Hi All,
The following is a brief description of Samsung SoC architecture from the
camera point of view and a corresponding device tree structure. It is based
on the media devices DT bindings design from Guennadi [1]. I incorporated
some changes proposed during reviews (e.g. s/link/endpoint). It
On 10/10/2012 10:15:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/09/2012 06:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> What more do you think needs discussion re: d
On 10/10/2012 09:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mi
On 10/10/2012 10:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 10:15:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/09/2012 06:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> >> On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> >> > On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> >>
Hi Hui,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:12:01PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote:
> The irq_to_gpio() is old, most platforms use GENERIC_GPIO framework
> and don't support this API anymore.
>
> The i.MX6q sabrelite platform equips an egalax touchscreen controller,
> and this platform already transfered to GENERI
On 10/10/2012 01:26 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
>> Seuqential patches from this series introduce SoC-specific data parsing
>> from device tree.
>>
>> This patch removes legacy GPIO bank nodes from exynos4210.dtsi and
>> replaces them with nodes
On 10/10/2012 07:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2012 17:15:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
...
>> But how do you get the subdev pointer? With the notifier I get it from
>> i2c_get_clientdata(client) and what do you do without it? How do you get
>> to the client?
>>
>>> And ca
On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>>
>>> What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+cpp?
>>
>> How not to abuse the ever-loving shit out of it? :-)
>
> Perhaps we can just handle this through the regular patch review
> process; I thin
On 10/10/2012 11:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 09:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott
* Stephen Warren [121010 09:36]:
> On 10/10/2012 01:26 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >
> >> Seuqential patches from this series introduce SoC-specific data parsing
> >> from device tree.
> >>
> >> This patch removes legacy GPIO bank nodes from
On 10/10/2012 7:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+cpp?
>>>
>>> How not to abuse the ever-loving shit out of it? :-)
>>
>> Perhaps we can just handle this
On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+cpp?
>>>
>>> How not to abuse the ever-loving shit out of it? :-)
>>
>> Perhaps we can just handle this
On 10/10/2012 11:18 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 11:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/10/2012 09:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wro
On 10/10/2012 12:23 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 7:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+cpp?
How not to abuse the ever-loving shit
On 10/10/2012 8:40 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+cpp?
How not to abuse the ever-loving shit
On 10/10/2012 8:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 12:23 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> On 10/10/2012 7:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>
>> What more do you think needs discussion re: dtc+c
Hi Laurent,
On 10/10/2012 03:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 13:00:24 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Tue 9 October 2012 12:34:48 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>> On 10/08/2012 11:40 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> I woul
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On 10/10/2012 03:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 October 2012 13:00:24 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Tue 9 October 2012 12:34:48 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>> On 10/08/2012 11:40 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
On 10/10/2012 10:32 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>>> We might actually not need that, it might be easier to handle the circular
>>> dependency problem from the other end. We could add a way (ioctl, sysfs,
>>> ...)
>>> to force a V4L2 bridge driver to release its subdevs. Once done, the subdev
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 10:50:20 Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 07:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 08 October 2012 17:15:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> ...
>
> >> But how do you get the subdev pointer? With the notifier I get it from
> >> i2c_get_clientdata(client) and
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 22:23:35 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 03:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 October 2012 13:00:24 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Tue 9 October 2012 12:34:48 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>> On 10/08/2012 11:40 AM, Guennadi Liakhovet
Hi Guennadi,
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 22:32:22 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 10/10/2012 03:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 October 2012 13:00:24 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > >> On Tue 9 October 2012 12:34:48 Sylwester Nawrock
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:16:34AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
[snip]
> >> .h files include both structs and defines, which are fine for
> >> ordinary C code, but problematic in this cont
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:41:45AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 1:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
[snip]
> >> .h files include both structs and defines, which are fine for
> >> ordinary C code, but problematic in this co
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:31AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
[snip]
> > That's probab
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:45:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 12:23 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> > On 10/10/2012 7:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >
> > What more do you think ne
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:22:02AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 10:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 10/10/2012 10:15:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2012 06:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> > On 10/09/2012 06:20:53 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >> >> On 10/9/2012 11:16 AM, Steph
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:56:11AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 8:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/10/2012 12:23 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >> On 10/10/2012 7:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 12:39 PM, Jon Loelig
Hi,
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [120919 04:32]:
> Added a driver for usb3 phy that handles the interaction between usb phy
> device and dwc3 controller.
>
> This also includes device tree support for usb3 phy driver and
> the documentation with device tree binding information is updated.
>
> Curre
On 10/10/2012 1:16 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:31AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:04
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:42:33PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 1:16 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:31AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On 10/10/2012 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>> On 10/10/2012 01:24 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 20
75 matches
Mail list logo
