Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] sound: sam9x5_wm8731: machine driver for at91sam9x5 wm8731 boards

2013-07-09 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/7/9 Mark Brown : > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:19:45AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: >> 2013/7/8 Mark Brown : > >> > The obvious question here is of course if we can use the same driver for >> > both of them. > >> I haven't got a g20 to test that, but that's the goal. > > I think I do somewhere.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] sound: sam9x5_wm8731: machine driver for at91sam9x5 wm8731 boards

2013-07-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:19:45AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > 2013/7/8 Mark Brown : > > The obvious question here is of course if we can use the same driver for > > both of them. > I haven't got a g20 to test that, but that's the goal. I think I do somewhere. > For now, g20 is still non-DT,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] sound: sam9x5_wm8731: machine driver for at91sam9x5 wm8731 boards

2013-07-09 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Richard, On 7/9/2013 16:19, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/8 Mark Brown : On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: + * Nicolas Ferre + * + * Based on sam9g20_wm8731.c by: + * Sedji Gaouaou The obvious question here is of course if we can use the same dr

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] sound: sam9x5_wm8731: machine driver for at91sam9x5 wm8731 boards

2013-07-09 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/7/8 Mark Brown : > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > >> + * Nicolas Ferre >> + * >> + * Based on sam9g20_wm8731.c by: >> + * Sedji Gaouaou > > The obvious question here is of course if we can use the same driver for > both of them. I haven't got a