Yea...I documented it with remarks too :-)
Don't you have a plane to catch..or a boat...or something
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-smith-devinfo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] free
Steve Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I made one last change this afternoon to my IPSEC VPN configuration to
> turn on compression for all three links.
Do you mean you did something like this:
conn %default
# How persistent to be in (re)keying negotiations (0 means very).
keyi
I made one last change this afternoon to my IPSEC VPN configuration to turn
on compression for all three links. They came back up without a hitch.
I modified the "/etc/e-smith/templates/etc/ipsec.conf/20Default" file adding
compress=yes to all three servers. I went into the IPSEC VPN panel, cho
Eric,
I have done something similar for schools, but should work
for you. check out my rpm
http://www.geocities.com/lapsch/rpms/
I'm still working on it but its working. except for the
help part.
--- "Womack, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Does anyone have a good method for replicating users
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:11:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a bit of a hypothetical question for 5.1 SME Server.
> Is there any possibility that the new 2.2.20 (released as final on
> Nov 2nd I believe) kernel might be used instead of the 2.2.19 kernel
> in 5.0?
Perfect. I imagine my SME 5.1 upgrade will be alot smoother now that I
don't have to move a bunch of files off the server!!!
Thanks again for all your contributions!!!
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Or if there's a way to modify the scripts that add local networks to reload
freeswan.
Maybe we can incorporate some of the Samba 2.2.2 pieces together to give us
a single Windows domain on the wide area network with PDC/BDC
functionality.with our free time that is :-}
- Original Message
> > If you use the secondary server only for file services (SAMBA)
> > and the other master server for all other requirements
> Maybe I'm being dense today, but I'm don't see how this buys you anything.
> How is this secondary Samba server different from any other client in the
> domain? I could
I think you are right. The reason I've used this directive is so that I don't have to
sync the passwords.
The password is changed on the "Master" SMB server. The secondary SMB verifys the
password using the master.
But yes.. the passwd and group files need to be synced so that permissions can
Steve Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The problem with tape is, I can't verify the backup...at least I can't
> figure out how. It would be nice to have the ability to restore a few
> files to verify the backup worked. There isn't an easy way to do that
> with SME5.
Until you load the rpm in
Steve Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I finished installing freeswan on a third SME5 server tonight.
Cool!
> btw - The installation is a snap with your rpm Darrell...
Excellent.
> When you add or delete a Local network from the server-manager, all the
> ipchains rules from _updown are remov
> If you use the secondary server only for file services (SAMBA)
> and the other master server for all other requirements
Maybe I'm being dense today, but I'm don't see how this buys you anything.
How is this secondary Samba server different from any other client in the
domain? I could just as ea
On 8 Nov 2001, Edward Tak wrote:
> If you use the secondary server only for file services (SAMBA) and the
> other master server for all other requirements, you can configure the
> samba on the secondary to authenicate against the master server's
> samba. See "password server =" smb.conf directi
13 matches
Mail list logo
