Hello Les,
mardi 13 août 2002 à 15:32:18, you wrote :
From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, it seems to make good sense to cc devinfo with bug reports,
especially on something that is alpha.
On no account cc devinfo. If you do that, every followup on devinfo will
open a new
Dear All,
Just a suggestion - how hard would it be to have your bug track system
send devinfo a daily or weekly digest of every new bug with 5.6 in the
subject line.
That way we could keep a track on what is causing you guys problems and
what isn't. We might even be able to help! At least it
Another suggestion. Perhaps a separate beta mailing list. This stuff
clearly does not fit the purpose of the devinfo mailing list, but much
of the audience is interested. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is likely to get
overwhelmed with non-bugs.
I have run many, many betas in my career and found a mailing
John
I tend to disagree.
Considering 5.6 is actually alpha/beta release, it is still under
development!
I can understand reporting a bug on a stable release to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but this shouldn't be the case with betas. I don't even see how you can
call a problem on a development
How do all the other beta testers avoid wasting their time dealing with the
same bug if they aren't discussed publicly? I thought the point of open
source development was to share this sort of thing.
That was the point of my original post on this topic. Correct me if I'm
wrong here
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Greg J. Zartman wrote:
That was the point of my original post on this topic. Correct me if I'm
wrong here Charlie
OK :-)
pre-release SME on this list. As an example, I recall having several
working conversations with both Charlie and Gordon as Mitel was working
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:
I personally would want as many developers know about the issues on
beta, so that they can get stuck in and help.
It's our release, we need to fix the bugs. We can't depend on you
developers out there to find and fix our bugs. We find and fix
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It might be. We'll consider it.
Just an idea How about a 'bug' forum with sub-forums by release?
Regards,
--
Darrell May
DMC Netsourced.com
http://netsourced.com
http://myEZserver.com
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Darrell May wrote:
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It might be. We'll consider it.
Just an idea How about a 'bug' forum with sub-forums by release?
That would provide N more places for us to look to find new bug reports -
see points 1 and 3 of my
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For releases, see http://www.e-smith.org/bugs.php3 for a list
of known bugs with workarounds.
For alpha/beta releases, please report *all* bugs found to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I have to toss in my 0.02 monetary units here (which is not much if
you
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) wrote:
That is Mitel's choice
Not entirely. Only a small number of people in this community has ever
contributed any patches back into the core product.
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) wrote:
That is Mitel's choice
Not entirely. Only a small number of people in this community has ever
contributed any patches back into the core product.
You being one of them :-)
--
Charlie
Hi Guys,
what about stop arguing about who's doing what - where less than two
month past the last release - having 5.6 out now is straight forward.
We - as the community should help Mitel on by reporting bugs and
testing beta. I think that will get us much faster closer to the next
upcoming
Hi,
I would like to build a custom version of e-smith/mitel.
I have found this HOWTO:
http://www.e-smith.org/docs/howto/contrib/e-smith-custom-iso.html
To make my own version, I have just add one package, zile.
It's a tiny emacs-like (zile-1.6.1-1.i386.rpm).
I followed the HOWTO's
Ive put together some packages that implement pop over ssl, imap over ssl,
and smtp over ssl using smtp authentication.
Available from:
http://www.pagefault.org/e-smith/contrib/index.html#securemail
e-smith-cvm-unix-0.0.1-01dc.noarch.rpm
sme server and gateway - unix credential
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, [ISO-8859-15] Valéry Febvre wrote:
To make my own version, I have just add one package, zile.
It's a tiny emacs-like (zile-1.6.1-1.i386.rpm).
Have you tried pico?
Second question:
I have no RedHat distribution, only a debian, so my e-smith modified is
build under
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:56:46 -0400 (EDT)
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, [ISO-8859-15] Valéry Febvre wrote:
To make my own version, I have just add one package, zile.
It's a tiny emacs-like (zile-1.6.1-1.i386.rpm).
Have you tried pico?
Second question:
17 matches
Mail list logo
