RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Rob Wellesley
> -Original Message- > From: Rob Wellesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Note that this adds plaintext authentication on the public > > interface, and > > hence is strongly discouraged just as public POP, IMAP and telnet are. > > A "work around" could be to use a single "locked" a

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Rob Wellesley
> -Original Message- > From: Charlie Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think this might be sufficient to set up support for inbound SMTP > authentication (and authorise relaying from the public side): > > echo cvm-local:/var/lib/cvm/cvm-unix-local.socket \ > > /var/service/smtpfront-q

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Darrell May wrote: > Assuming this is reported to work on SME6, what would be required to add > this simple SMTP authentication to SME5.5/5.6? Would it simply be > installing/upgrading a few selected rpms from 6.0? I don't know - you'd have to try it. {But I'm not sure why

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Darrell May
> Why do you ask? Simply to clarify your response was based on SME6/cvm-0.11-1. > Did you try it and it didn't work? No. I have no SME 6 servers to test external SMTP Auth with at the moment. Possibly someone else on list can test and report their results. Assuming this is reported to work on S

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Darrell May wrote: > > echo cvm-local:/var/lib/cvm/cvm-unix-local.socket \ > > > /var/service/smtpfront-qmail/env/CVM_SASL_PLAIN > > Is this SME6, cvm-0.11-1 only? SME6, yes. There's no cvm running in an unmodified 5.6. The version of cvm shouldn't matter, as long as the

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Darrell May
> echo cvm-local:/var/lib/cvm/cvm-unix-local.socket \ > > /var/service/smtpfront-qmail/env/CVM_SASL_PLAIN Is this SME6, cvm-0.11-1 only? Darrell -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partn

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Darrell May wrote: > http://www.pagefault.org/code/e-smith.shtml#securemail > > Reportedly works on SME5.5/5.6 however a forum post where this contrib was > tried on SME6 reported problems: > > http://www.e-smith.org/bboard/read.php?v=t&f=3&i=38978&t=38835 > > Appears it n

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Darrell May
http://www.pagefault.org/code/e-smith.shtml#securemail Reportedly works on SME5.5/5.6 however a forum post where this contrib was tried on SME6 reported problems: http://www.e-smith.org/bboard/read.php?v=t&f=3&i=38978&t=38835 Appears it needs to be re-engineered for SME6 rpm and dovecot IMAP dif

[e-smith-devinfo] SMTP authentication

2003-11-21 Thread Rob Wellesley
Yonks ago Gordon Rowell wrote: > > There are two parts to SMTP authentication - inbound (require some > form of authentication in order to relay mail via this server - one > possible solution here) and outbound (ISP mail relay requires SMTP AUTH > to send mail). > > Both would be useful. Anyone lo