Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Powerswitch for SME

2003-12-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
- Original Message - From: "Michiel Blotwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:42 AM Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Powerswitch for SME > Hi, > > I compiled and repackaged Joris van Rantwijk's powerswitch module for > the SME server. From Joris

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] GPL

2003-12-17 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:34:48PM +1000, Peter Lambert wrote: > Charlie, > > Are the sources Mitel are releasing sufficient to build the "unsupported > developer release" 6.0 ISO when compiled with other open, readily available > sources ?. > > If there are Mitel proprietary sources involved, ar

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan

2003-12-08 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:19:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, Here is what I've seen so far. > Redhat and RPM although relible and well estabilshed are NOT good package > management systems. Too much micromanagment is required on the part of the > system administrator. Debain Support

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan

2003-12-08 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Brandon Friedman wrote: > Why not look at Gentoo and their portage system? Because I don't think Gentoo is at all appropriate for an E-smith type system. It's fine for developers who want bleeding edge desktop systems but doesn't offer any advantages at a

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-freeswan

2003-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:50:53AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > I'm intrigued by the ipsec.conf file that the devinfo package creates, > where 4 connections are formed. What's the intention behind this > design? Does it help avoid routing problems? Ech, forget it.

[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-freeswan

2003-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
I've been trying out ipsec and the devinfo-freeswan package for 5.6. Got it working between two e-smith boxes on the local lan but in a short while I'm going to have to set up vpn links between e-smith boxes in remote offices and a central Sonicwall router, which will mean rolling my own custom scr

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: Compiling kernel modules (was Re: 2 questions)

2003-11-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:33:33PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > Spec file is attached. That should allow you to build your own binary > RPMs. Use "rpmbuild -bb --target=xxx powerswitch.spec". Excellent. One thing, though: is anything on an E-smith system likely to unload that module? I'm consi

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: Compiling kernel modules (was Re: 2 questions)

2003-11-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:49:50AM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > The easiest way to end up with a module which will load and work is just > to run "make" in the powerswitch directory after you untar the source. > RedHat have tweaked the kernel source so that you get compile options set > to build

[e-smith-devinfo] 2 questions

2003-11-11 Thread Bruce Richardson
It's a while since I did any serious development on a Red Hat (based) system. Since the few e-smith rpms I've been working on so far are all noarch, I've been able to build them quite happily using rpm on Debian. Now, though, I need to do some building on a real E-smith system, so... 1. Is the s

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Powerswitch

2003-11-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:31:53PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Anybody happen to know Joris van Rantwijk? I've been trying to contact > him to find out if he's willing to put the code under a free software > license and/or hand it over to another maintainer. I heard from

[e-smith-devinfo] Powerswitch

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
Recently I came across a very useful piece of code called Powerswitch. It's a small kernel module that intercepts and cancels APM/ACPI suspend signals and then runs 'shutdown -h now'. This means that if your e-smith machine has any halfway recent bios you can trigger a clean shutdown by pressing t