> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 05:52:53PM +1300, Michael Doerner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > P.S.: Nice to see another E-smith (+ ADSL) user in NZ!
>
> And really nice for us to see that the integration of PPPoE works
> elsewhere as well.
>
> Are the username/password for PPPoE screens w
> Great - that seems to fit in well. Have you tried the PPPoE support in
> 4.1b2 with T-Online? The PPPoE account and password dialogues don't
> validate the strings in any way, but the templates quote them for the
> PPPoE configuration.
> Gordon
Not yet, but is planned for the days past christma
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Michael Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The format of the username for the T-Online DSL connection is:
> #[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> n, m is given by T-Online, 001 can also be 002 for a subuser account the
> rest is fixed.
Great - th
Zitiere John Sadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Apart from the known error after Post Install, I cannot connect
> to the
> e-smith server with a browser,
> using x.x.x.x/e-smith-manager.
>
> Has this changed?
> I get a x.x.x.x:980 error.
Hi John,
I ran into the same problem.
Setting the browser's co
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:42 AM
> To: Gordon Rowell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: OT [e-smith-devinfo] Using e-smith 4.1
> Beta with a browser.
>
>
> Zitiere Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Are t
Zitiere Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are the username/password for PPPoE screens worded clearly
> enough?
Yes.
> Do you need username@carrier in N.Z., or just username? Both
> carriers
> in Ottawa use username@carrier.
>
> Anyone in other regions able to comment?
Gordon,
here in Germa
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 05:52:53PM +1300, Michael Doerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> P.S.: Nice to see another E-smith (+ ADSL) user in NZ!
And really nice for us to see that the integration of PPPoE works
elsewhere as well.
Are the username/password for PPPoE screens worded clearly en
John,
it's a known issue for this Beta 1 version. No big problem.
Have a look on the e-smith web site where the known issues are explained
http://www.e-smith.org/development/release/4.1-beta1/status.php3
and you will find a remedy there (uninstalling a ssl rpm).
Regards,
Michael Doerner
P.S.: