Greg,
> 1) Some time back one of the devinfo folks supplied a link to an article
> detailing an sys-admins view of the 2.4 linux kernel. He put forward a
> really good argument against switching. I'm not proposing abandoning the
> idea of a newer kernel, just pointing out some "food for thought
Couple of comments:
1) Some time back one of the devinfo folks supplied a link to an article
detailing an sys-admins view of the 2.4 linux kernel. He put forward a
really good argument against switching. I'm not proposing abandoning the
idea of a newer kernel, just pointing out some "food for
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:
> >Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> >> And thats going well...
> >
> >At least they tried. No one else has done better.
>
> What has happened to axonlinux?
Disappeared without a trace.
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PR
ED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:44 AM
> To: Devinfo@E-Smith. Org
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re:
> [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]
>
>
> Anecdotal Evidence (tm) says that the RedHat 2.4.9 (includes patches) is
> the most reliable. (ie
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2002 5:05 PM
> To: Damien Curtain; Darrell May
> Cc: stephen noble; e-smith-devinfo
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re:
> [e-smith-devinfo] krud? +
>Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> And thats going well...
>
>At least they tried. No one else has done better.
>
What has happened to axonlinux?
--
Regards
Brandon Friedman
Product Manager
Tech-Knowledgy Advantage
Ph: +27 (011) 486-0626
Fax: +27 (011) 486-0629
Cell: +27 (083) 40
Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
> Im not sure how in touch people here are with kernel development,
because
> I wouldnt be rushing to stick the latest and greatest 2.4 kernel on any
> machine other than crash
stephen noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> would you like to remind us briefly how difficult it
> would be to place SME on top of a redhat distro
If we take axonlinux as a project that has travelled this path already,
they built a new distro iso. To be very brief they essentially took a
dis
> I don't see that there would be any advantage. SME
> server is already based on RedHat with all
applicable errata and updates applied. So what
> does krud buy us?
X
it would be easier to turn your pc into a terminal
server http://sourceforge.net/projects/ltsp/
if SME is redhat +/- a few bit
