Re: [e-smith-devinfo] reply-to-all (was Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)

2003-12-17 Thread Shad L. Lords
> > What I find anoying is that I must either do a reply-to and change the to > > address or do a reply-to-all and delete the personal adress... > > You could just do reply-to-all and allow the recipient to delete > duplicates. Or wait for the list to move to mailman. Mailman is smart enough to s

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] reply-to-all (was Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)

2003-12-17 Thread John Cusick
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 10:13, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Courchesne, Andre wrote: > ... > That's a matter of education. It's not a bad idea for every email sender > to be aware of who they are sending messages to. I couldn't agree more Charlie, every mailing list is handled diffe

[e-smith-devinfo] reply-to-all (was Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)

2003-12-17 Thread Charlie Brady
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Courchesne, Andre wrote: > What I find anoying is that I must either do a reply-to and change the to > address or do a reply-to-all and delete the personal adress... You could just do reply-to-all and allow the recipient to delete duplicates. > Also I beleive there must be