> > What I find anoying is that I must either do a reply-to and change the to > > address or do a reply-to-all and delete the personal adress... > > You could just do reply-to-all and allow the recipient to delete > duplicates.
Or wait for the list to move to mailman. Mailman is smart enough to see if you are recieving a copy of the message directly. If you are then mailman will not send you out a copy because you already got one. > > Also I beleive there must be a lot of reply lost because people only do > > reply and the information only goes to the sender and not the list... > > That's a matter of education. It's not a bad idea for every email sender > to be aware of who they are sending messages to. I agree with Charlie on this one. If you set the reply-to header to the list then there is no easy to reply directly to the sender. It is a matter of saying to yourself do I want to reply to the sender directly or to all (list and sender). -Shad -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
