erty
> Cc: Devinfo
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [ALPHA] mailrules for SME5.5 available
> [was Possible mailfront replacement]
>
>
>
> Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > True, but the ruleset is entirely up to you. The rules file used is
> > c
Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> True, but the ruleset is entirely up to you. The rules file used is
> configurable via an environment variable, and can be set differently
> depending on originating IP address.
Charlie, I'd very much appreciate it if you would further share your
experti
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:22:21PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Further testing has proven '*@*' does not work either :-< This blocks
> > sending to undefined external addresses. The '*' magical implementation is
> > a pain b
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:22:21PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Yeah, I see why the feature exists, and it's useful -- but I'd still
> > have preferred a different directive for sender rules instead of
> > making "*" magical. (Hav
