RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was[5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-19 Thread Paul Miller
Les, Charlie, devinfo list members, Sorry for this continuing rant on policy. --- From: Paul Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] And I thought it is the right/responsibility of the developer to accept/reject/ignore any and all suggestions from the community with priority given to

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-18 Thread Les Mikesell
From: Paul Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] And I thought it is the right/responsibility of the developer to accept/reject/ignore any and all suggestions from the community with priority given to developing good code. Do you think Linus incorporates every patch or even responds to all

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was[5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-17 Thread Paul Miller
From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, it seems to make good sense to cc devinfo with bug reports, especially on something that is alpha. On no account cc devinfo. If you do that, every followup on devinfo will open a new ticket in our bug tracking system (as we've said

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-13 Thread Julian Luton
it would stop this endless spam on devinfo ;-) All the best, Julian Luton -Original Message- From: Les Mikesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 05:32 To: Charlie Brady; Greg J. Zartman Cc: Devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was[5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-13 Thread John Powell
. Zartman Cc: Devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to) From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, it seems to make good sense to cc devinfo with bug reports, especially on something that is alpha

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-13 Thread Brandon Friedman
; Greg J. Zartman Cc: Devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to) From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, it seems to make good sense to cc devinfo with bug reports, especially on something that is alpha. On no account cc

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-13 Thread Greg J. Zartman
How do all the other beta testers avoid wasting their time dealing with the same bug if they aren't discussed publicly? I thought the point of open source development was to share this sort of thing. That was the point of my original post on this topic. Correct me if I'm wrong here

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reporting bugs (was Re: bug posting? [was [5.6] unable to login to)

2002-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, it seems to make good sense to cc devinfo with bug reports, especially on something that is alpha. On no account cc devinfo. If you do that, every followup on devinfo will open a new ticket in our bug tracking system (as we've said here