Hello all,
Greetings all.
I'm diving into SME6.0 and require access to SRPMS for development. I
visited a few mirrors and did not find any. If Mitel has not already
done so, would someone from Mitel please make the SRPMS available as
soon as convenient. If they are available, would someone ple
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:43:17PM -0400, "Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A simple mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" would have been sufficient,
> > rather than a mail to over 700 recipients of the list.
>
> I didn't realize not being able to find the SRPMS was a bug :-)
> [..
> A simple mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" would have been sufficient,
> rather than a mail to over 700 recipients of the list.
I didn't realize not being able to find the SRPMS was a bug :-)
Sorry to abuse the list, but I have to agree with Hsing-Foo's comments. The
rift between Darrell and Mitel is
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:53:15PM -0500, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I'm diving into SME6.0 and require access to SRPMS for development. I
> visited a few mirrors and did not find any.
The source RPMS are making their way to the mirror sites now.
Naturally, an
Dear all,
Once upon a time I stumble upon these kind of threads
I do not wish to insult _anybody_ and I have to speak out loud;
1. How come there _seems_ to be a 'strugle' between Charlie and Darrell?
Is this the appropiate place to 'react' to each other...
2. How come that Mitel _sometime
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Darrell May wrote:
> I'm diving into SME6.0 and require access to SRPMS for development. I
> visited a few mirrors and did not find any. If Mitel has not already
> done so, would someone from Mitel please make the SRPMS available as
> soon as convenient. If they are availa
