Great thanks. Just wanted to make sure everything was in sync.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Courchesne, Andre
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
On Wed, Dec
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:19:28PM -0500, "Courchesne, Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sounds good for me. I had not read the release notes inside the source rpm
> yet (shame on me). But shoudn't the source package name change automatically
> when doing the "rpm -bs" or "rpm -ba" ?
Yes, it sh
t: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:38:09PM -0500, Courchesne, Andre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If e-smith-release-5.5-03 is more recent can it's corresponsing sou
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:38:09PM -0500, Courchesne, Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If e-smith-release-5.5-03 is more recent can it's corresponsing source
> package be made available?
For what it's worth, there's nothing you're missing:
* Thu Jun 27 2002 Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECT
