On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Lars Stea wrote:
> Doesw anybody know exactly how much memory is needed to do an uppgrade?
No, nobody knows.
End of thread please, this is not a development issue.
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network Server Solutions Gr
On 10/02/03 ed sharpe did say:
> I GUESS THE QUESTION HE MAY HAVE WANTED TO ASK IS WHY DID IT CHANGE FROM
> ONE RELEASE TO ANOTHER?
> ONE WOULD ASSUME MEMORY USE WOULD REMAIN CONSTANT. OPPS SORRY FOR THE CAPS
> BUT IT IS LATE AND I DO NOT FELL LIKE RETYPING THIS.
Across major kernel versio
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, ed sharpe wrote:
> I GUESS THE QUESTION HE MAY HAVE WANTED TO ASK IS WHY DID IT CHANGE FROM
> ONE RELEASE TO ANOTHER?
I don't know that there is any difference between the distributions and
the comments posted don't show that either. ie the difference between 53%
at a given
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: ".:andrej fercic:." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:55 PM
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] uppgrade 5.5 to 5.6 memory issue
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Graeme Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Graeme Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, .:andrej fercic:. wrote:
>
> > I am not sure but i have noticed that 5.6 eats much more memory as 5.5.
> > I jave two SME server running quite equal load. 1st is SME 5.5 with
> > 128MB and memory utilization is 56% (phpsysinfo), b
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, .:andrej fercic:. wrote:
> I am not sure but i have noticed that 5.6 eats much more memory as 5.5.
> I jave two SME server running quite equal load. 1st is SME 5.5 with
> 128MB and memory utilization is 56% (phpsysinfo), but on 5.6 with 256MB
> is 92%. Is this normal???
Yes.
I am not sure but i have noticed that 5.6 eats much more memory as 5.5.
I jave two SME server running quite equal load. 1st is SME 5.5 with
128MB and memory utilization is 56% (phpsysinfo), but on 5.6 with 256MB
is 92%. Is this normal???
Andrej
-Original Message-
From: Lars Stea [mailto:[