On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2001 13:39, Scott wrote:
< >
> > We already do that. If its *not* trimming back down, then you have
> > connections stuck open or the thread trimming isn't working.
> >
> I'm pretty sure the thread trimming is working. I ins
Woops, that's Feb 22 at 11:00am.
Kirk
--
Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.
Fred,
Whatever your problem with the client hitting 100% CPU is, it's probably
unrelated to the node 100% CPU problem. I'm unsure from reading this thread
whether it may have something to do with the ThreadPool bugs GJ and Scott
have been working on.
good luck
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 08:34:49AM
It is cvs of feb 23 at about 11:00am.
Kirk
--
Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetpro
't up there yet
> either)...
Will do.
Scott
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/35db4d54/attachment.pgp>
>
> Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility
> e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.caUniversity of Western Ontario
> phone: (519) 661-3061
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
gyro elmer scott girl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/1796a3ce/attachment.pgp>
I was kidding. Somebody said all their references was to one address,
and I grepped my maildir for that address and only you came up.
Obviously I didn't think you were.
Just having a large DataStore should not lead to this effect.
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his h
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:21:20AM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote:
> > HOWEVER, would it make sense to start reaping unused threads? Like,
> > have a parameter, something like maxIdleThreads, so that if a thread
> > is reclaim()'d and there are already maxIdleThr
Erm, can't you just do
mybat.bat >output.txt
or
mybat.bat 1>all.txt 2>&1
You might find this gives you an access violation, in which case you might
need Win2K SP2 ...
( Q264824 mentions a hotfix but I believe it only works on NT4 )
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Salzer"
> I'
Well, I currently have no connections and 33 processes on one machine
and no connections and 115 processes on the second machine. The only
difference is many more failed requests through fproxy on the second
machine. It is getting a bit worrysome though.
Kirk
--
Kirk Reiser
ation to ThreadPool.java are attached. (This isn't a
patch, I'm posting it in case someone else wants to try my experiments.)
--gj
--
Web page inside Freenet:
freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: threadpool.instrument.deltas
Type: text/english
Size: 1686 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/3821c4f5/attachment.bin>
"Scott G. Miller" writes:
> Could you post the netstat and top outputs?
Okay here they are. The top cut off the command after the first
command line argument but freenet is the only java processes running.
2:39pm up 21 days, 22:01, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
73 processes: 71
Thanks for the 2nd syntax. I've used the first one since early DOS days, but
it just doesn't work for Win2K .bat files and I've never seen the second one
before. I have SP2 installed. However, the 2nd one works perfectly.
Fred
-Original Message-
On February 22, 2001 11:04 Dave Hooper wrot
?
Thanks
scott
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/4cfd80cf/attachment.pgp>
"Scott G. Miller" writes:
> We already do that. If its *not* trimming back down, then you have
> connections stuck open or the thread trimming isn't working.
>
> Check netstat to see if you have open, idle connections to freenet nodes.
I did and there are none. There is one socket listening o
u have open, idle connections to freenet nodes.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/ce5deb89/attachment.pgp>
Mr.Bad writes:
> Hrm. Actually, that's perfectly normal.
>
> HOWEVER, would it make sense to start reaping unused threads? Like,
> have a parameter, something like maxIdleThreads, so that if a thread
> is reclaim()'d and there are already maxIdleThreads around, go ahead
> and kill it.
Probably
hmmm, I don't know if this is normal or not but I've noticed that
after the server is started I have 11 java processes/threads. After I
have done a number of look ups on one box the number of processes go
up to 23 currently. On another box which got a bunch of request
failed messages it is curren
attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/73e8a38c/attachment.pgp>
gnature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/12789d17/attachment.pgp>
> "KR" == Kirk Reiser writes:
KR> hmmm, I don't know if this is normal or not but I've noticed
KR> that after the server is started I have 11 java
KR> processes/threads. After I have done a number of look ups on
KR> one box the number of processes go up to 23 currently. On
Although java.w never goes to 100%, I find now that on requesting, I have
received the attached error several times and that the instance of java.exe
running for the client goes to 100% CPU. I'm providing a link to a .jpg for
the error message because I've yet to figure out how to redirect (Win2K)
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! for the fix. I ran three request .bat files
overnight and CPU didn't go to 100%. Previously, it would go to 100% after a
few minutes or so if I requested/inserted and in a few hours or so running
and no requests or inserts.
Fred
-Original Message-
On Febru
I think the biggest advantage of Web Start is the "auto-updating" as
described below: (cut from the FAQ)
Why does JavaTM Web Start download the application the next time?
JavaTM Web Start will always launch the application from the cache, if
possible, and it will simultaneously perform a backgr
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:48:24PM -0800, Mr . Bad wrote:
> You're right! It's been a whole 9 hours since that message was sent --
> I don't know what to say. I guess I can only plead COMPLETE
> INCOMPETENCE.
Shit, man, you act like you're not getting paid for this. ;^p
> Anyways, despite my ine
ssimilation, submission, ignorance,
hypocrisy, brutality, the elite.
All of which are American dreams.
- Rage Against The Machine
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1402 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010222/022f27b8/attachment.pgp>
26 matches
Mail list logo
