Re: [freenet-devl] fcptools on Solaris

2001-10-23 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Thursday 11 October 2001 03:59 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have commit configure tests for -lnsl and -lsocket (see commitlog). > > to Derek Glidden: > Could you test the new configure script? > There also seems to be an issue with Solaris / multithreaded apps > and Alarm Clock (SIG

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 10:04 pm, ken restivo wrote: > that's bizarre. i updated to latest cvs. i will try one more thing > (just in case) since i have been having mailer issues. > > attached is the patch in .gz format. > > -ken Patch committed. I had to pass -p0 to the 'patch' program. --

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread David McNab
From: "ken restivo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that's bizarre. i updated to latest cvs. i will try one more thing (just in case) since i have been having mailer issues. attached is the patch in .gz format. if you want to have another go at it, please do. otherwise i'll send a tarball. sorry for all the i

[freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread ken restivo
cracy in the middle east, go here: http://www.realgoods.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: netbsd.patch.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 7670 bytes Desc: compressed patch URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011023/

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread ken restivo
that's bizarre. i updated to latest cvs. i will try one more thing (just in case) since i have been having mailer issues. attached is the patch in .gz format. if you want to have another go at it, please do. otherwise i'll send a tarball. sorry for all the inconvenience. -ken -- On We

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread David McNab
From: "ken restivo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sorry - your revised patch doesn't work either. Very few hunks work, most fail. If someone else can get the patch to work, then please apply it and check in patched files to cvs. Otherwise, if you want to send me the changed files, I'll integrate chan

[freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread David McNab
thanks ken for the patch regrettably it failed. can you please ensure you've got latest version of the fcptools files from cvs, and re-generate the patch. seems the patch only applies to makefile.am otherwise, you could just tar up the modified files and send them to me cheers david ___

[freenet-devl] Node freeze

2001-10-23 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:27:19AM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote: <> > These lines repeat every 5 secs or so and the node is effectively dead, after > a restart, it takes about 1h to > reach this state again... Yes, thelema was having this exact problem last night. If you could get a threaddump (sen

[freenet-devl] Node freeze

2001-10-23 Thread Volker Stolz
Hi, after a short time on a 0.4 node I get Oct 23, 2001 9:53:33 AM (Freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/4109): Pruning connections Oct 23, 2001 9:53:33 AM (Freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/4109): Stopped 0 connections; effect may not be instant. Oct 23, 2001 9:5

[freenet-devl] Private Addresses

2001-10-23 Thread Gabriel Russell
>A node should never accept a private address from a non-private addressed >node, and a node should never send a private address to a non-private >addressed node. This would contain the private addresses within private >networks. More specifically, a node should only accept private address fro

[freenet-devl] Private Addresses

2001-10-23 Thread Gabriel Russell
>Easy. Make a configuration options like this: > ># Set to "yes" to allow your node to cache private addresses. Most people= >=20 ># do not need to change this. ># >allowPrivateAddress =3D no > >If set to "no", the node dumps any private IP addresses it receives. I don't see a strong reason to

[freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread karl.di...@triplan.com
Zitiere ken restivo : > ok, here is the patch again, as an attachment. i would guess that mutt > is inserting line breaks or something to mangle the patch. > > i used the cvs diff -uN flag too. Looks perfect, expect that the configure check for pthread on FreeBSD should not add to LIBS but only

[freenet-devl] Network code

2001-10-23 Thread Volker Stolz
In local.freenet, you wrote: > The superdir of your Freenet directory of course. Depending on what you > are building, you may also need to make the Contrib/javax and > Contrib/junit classes available. Thanks, I was lacking the javax-stuff (which is kind of counter intuitive as I thought that java

[freenet-devl] Private Addresses

2001-10-23 Thread Volker Stolz
In local.freenet, you wrote: > A related question: how can this be accomplished while allowing Freenets > to exist in private blocks with the ability to connect to the larger > network as well as directly with each other? That's hard to domaybe you could add a command line switch which tells

[freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread ken restivo
A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: msg.pgp Type: application/pgp Size: 2559 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011023/48a6d4e0/attachment.bin>

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread ken restivo
msg.pgp

[freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread karl.di...@triplan.com
Zitiere David McNab : > thanks ken for the patch second that > regrettably it failed. > > can you please ensure you've got latest version of the fcptools files > from > cvs, and re-generate the patch. Please generete the unified diffs with diff -ruN thats cvs diff -uN for CVS users (put "diff

[freenet-devl] Private Addresses

2001-10-23 Thread Gabriel Russell
>A node should never accept a private address from a non-private addressed >node, and a node should never send a private address to a non-private >addressed node. This would contain the private addresses within private >networks. More specifically, a node should only accept private address fr

[freenet-devl] Private Addresses

2001-10-23 Thread Gabriel Russell
>Easy. Make a configuration options like this: > ># Set to "yes" to allow your node to cache private addresses. Most people= >=20 ># do not need to change this. ># >allowPrivateAddress =3D no > >If set to "no", the node dumps any private IP addresses it receives. I don't see a strong reason to

[freenet-devl] Ant build script

2001-10-23 Thread Vesa Salento
I downloaded the Freenet sources from the CVS and noticed that the ant build script didn't function anymore. I made a new one based on the Makefile and now I could update it to CVS but I don't have write access there. I suppose we can have both the Ant and Make build scripts since they are quite e

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread Karl . Dietz
Zitiere ken restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ok, here is the patch again, as an attachment. i would guess that mutt > is inserting line breaks or something to mangle the patch. > > i used the cvs diff -uN flag too. Looks perfect, expect that the configure check for pthread on FreeBSD should not

Re: [freenet-devl] Node freeze

2001-10-23 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:27:19AM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote: <> > These lines repeat every 5 secs or so and the node is effectively dead, after a >restart, it takes about 1h to > reach this state again... Yes, thelema was having this exact problem last night. If you could get a threaddump (sen

[freenet-devl] Node freeze

2001-10-23 Thread Volker Stolz
Hi, after a short time on a 0.4 node I get Oct 23, 2001 9:53:33 AM (Freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/4109): Pruning connections Oct 23, 2001 9:53:33 AM (Freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/4109): Stopped 0 connections; effect may not be instant. Oct 23, 2001 9:

[freenet-devl] larger store size

2001-10-23 Thread Emil Mikulic
> > > In the meantime, I or Sebastian will need to add code to the config > > > program > > > to allow sizes > 2047 if the disk is NTFS/ > > > > I thought the 2GB limit was due to the Java VM, as well as the OS. > > (i.e. If the OS allows it, the VM might not) > > I think the Java standards spec