>From Travis Bemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It would be more appropriate to do so with something like graphical
>Links; Mozilla is wayyy to bloated a program to start with...
how is graphical links portability wise?
--
Benjamin Coates
___
devl mailing
Unfortunately, there is no right way to do that.
In general, having a bunch of servlets running as one server each is
really dumb - what we ought to do is have them all running in one server.
While on the subject, I couldn't disagree more with your choice to make
the gateway page an infolet. Th
fish writes:
> On 8 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a way to get at the size of a splitfile's blocks before
> > successfully fetching one block? I'm trying to snarf a number of
> > blocks simultanously, immediately dropping them into their right
> > positions in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Someone didn't get a cookie in their lunch today.
On Sunday 08 September 2002 19:53, dar-gon at mchsi.com wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2002 at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > While on the subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If we wanted to go that far, we wouldn't need FProxy in the first place.
FProxy is there because it makes the browser take care of all the messy GUI
stuff. It kinda goes along with the idea of making a web browser a
*platform*, not just a way of d
On 8 Sep 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> What about FEC? Are you wondering if he's implementing it?
well, yeah :-p.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/bfbd7b81/attachment.pgp>
Hi!
I found a testsuite for users. You can install it on the project server, if you
think it's useful.
http://entropymine.com/jason/testbed/mime/
The link to the testsuite on the project server or to this URL can you include
to the FProxy gateway.
The user can check his browser himself. If he
fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a way to get at the size of a splitfile's blocks before
> > successfully fetching one block? I'm trying to snarf a number of
> > blocks simultanously, immediately dropping them into their right
On 8 Sep 2002 at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > While on the subject, I couldn't disagree more with your choice to make
> > the gateway page an infolet. The gateway concerns users, the infolets
> > concern beta testers - most u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Someone didn't get a cookie in their lunch today.
On Sunday 08 September 2002 19:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2002 at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > While on the subject,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If we wanted to go that far, we wouldn't need FProxy in the first place.
FProxy is there because it makes the browser take care of all the messy GUI
stuff. It kinda goes along with the idea of making a web browser a
*platform*, not just a way of
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:37:33PM -0500, Eric Thacker wrote:
> Heres another idea.. What about a freenet browser? Why not just hack
> up the mozilla code and release a browser that runs on every OS, works
> with fproxy, and solves the IE/Media URL problems. This way there would
> be a browser t
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> FCPTools are fkay as hell, slow and totally unusable in my XP environment.
>
> ANND NO ONE Shouldhave to join some fuckin linux religion to simply inset keys.
>
> Fish is even worse.
So you'll be submitting your patches to add the planned nice
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> This looks like just the ticket...
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239750
>
> Nice name for the registry key, 'isPlainTextHonoured'. You'd think it was
> optional to display plain text as plain text.
it is... l
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/abd1179e/attachment.pgp>
On 8 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to get at the size of a splitfile's blocks before
> successfully fetching one block? I'm trying to snarf a number of
> blocks simultanously, immediately dropping them into their right
> positions in the same destination file (rathe
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:05:20AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Well, is it possible to get to it via a static variable or method
> > somewhere?
>
> No, I have tried desperately to avoid static hacks to solve such things.
> I was trying to solve the problem before, when I wanted to make an i
s
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/e748613a/attachment.pgp>
ature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/023b2469/attachment.pgp>
dar-gon, when do you plan to graduate from elementary school? i'd like
to have a word with your parents first...
dar-gon at mchsi.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8 Sep 2002 at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>>While on the s
dar-gon, when do you plan to graduate from elementary school? i'd like
to have a word with your parents first...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8 Sep 2002 at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>>While on the sub
On 8 Sep 2002 at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > While on the subject, I couldn't disagree more with your choice to make
> > the gateway page an infolet. The gateway concerns users, the infolets
> > concern beta testers - most
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:37:33PM -0500, Eric Thacker wrote:
> Heres another idea.. What about a freenet browser? Why not just hack
> up the mozilla code and release a browser that runs on every OS, works
> with fproxy, and solves the IE/Media URL problems. This way there would
> be a browser
Robert Bihlmeyer writes:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to get at the size of a splitfile's blocks before
> successfully fetching one block? I'm trying to snarf a number of
> blocks simultanously, immediately dropping them into their right
> positions in the same destination file (rather than into a n
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 09:43:41AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
<>
> Bleah. My config file does indeed have a messageStoreSize of 5. It also
> has a "%messageStoreSize=1000" line, which is a bit confusing... but anyway,
> it appears that the Windows installer comes with its own set defaul
Hi. I have been testing the new announcement code, with 2 and 3
announcementThreads, on the public network. I end up with graphs with a
big spike (in requests, and later in routing table), at one of the
announcements. The other two are smaller, much smaller usually. Now, we
know that announcing to
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:34:42PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Unfortunately, there is no right way to do that.
>
> Well, is it possible to get to it via a static variable or method
> somewhere?
No, I have tried desperately to
Heres another idea.. What about a freenet browser? Why not just hack
up the mozilla code and release a browser that runs on every OS, works
with fproxy, and solves the IE/Media URL problems. This way there would
be a browser that definatly WORKS without the freenet developers having
to figure ou
ocut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/e77a7fbb/attachment.pgp>
.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/f29f0eeb/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:53:28AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Oskar Sandberg
> >On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >> The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound,
> >> i've got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it appears
> >> free
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> Unfortunately, there is no right way to do that.
Well, is it possible to get to it via a static variable or method
somewhere?
I am somewhat confused by the distinction between a Params object, and a
Config object too.
Ian.
--
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> While on the subject, I couldn't disagree more with your choice to make
> the gateway page an infolet. The gateway concerns users, the infolets
> concern beta testers - most users should never have to see (or even run,
> though if i
This seems to only apply to IE5/win9x. I find no such registry key on my
IE6/WinXP box.
- Original Message -
From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users
> This looks like just the ticket...
>
> h
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Ian Clarke
>
> >java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
>
> The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound, i've
> got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it appears
> freenet.node
Unfortunately, there is no right way to do that.
In general, having a bunch of servlets running as one server each is
really dumb - what we ought to do is have them all running in one server.
While on the subject, I couldn't disagree more with your choice to make
the gateway page an infolet. T
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to get at the size of a splitfile's blocks before
> successfully fetching one block? I'm trying to snarf a number of
> blocks simultanously, immediately dropping them into their right
> positions in the same destination file (
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002 eric at caffrey.net wrote:
> I don't know if this has been brought up before, but the windows media files
> (*.wm* such as *.wma *.wmv) allow a URL to be automatically accessed by
> the media file. For example, once a movie file starts rolling credits,
> the people who encoded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 07 September 2002 23:47, Dan Merillat wrote:
<>
> Here's the anonymity risks:
>
> 1) Image/somethingwedontrecognize <-- IE, netscape like to load "plugins"
> for things it dosn't recognize. Someone could compromise the download
> server f
Hi,
is there a way to get at the size of a splitfile's blocks before
successfully fetching one block? I'm trying to snarf a number of
blocks simultanously, immediately dropping them into their right
positions in the same destination file (rather than into a number of
temp files). This is only pos
Heres another idea.. What about a freenet browser? Why not just hack
up the mozilla code and release a browser that runs on every OS, works
with fproxy, and solves the IE/Media URL problems. This way there would
be a browser that definatly WORKS without the freenet developers having
to figure o
I was just about to post the same thing,
It seems like explorer evolved and decided we should just apply our patches
and not fiddle with the internals.
I wonder what would happen if I added the key? Ho hum...
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admi
This looks like just the ticket...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239750
Nice name for the registry key, 'isPlainTextHonoured'. You'd think it was
optional to display plain text as plain text.
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mail
Dan Merillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please tell me you're poplating the known-types, rather then the safe
> list?
The former. Rest assured.
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
I was just about to post the same thing,
It seems like explorer evolved and decided we should just apply our patches
and not fiddle with the internals.
I wonder what would happen if I added the key? Ho hum...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/d6b32bff/attachment.pgp>
This seems to only apply to IE5/win9x. I find no such registry key on my
IE6/WinXP box.
- Original Message -
From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users
> T
This looks like just the ticket...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239750
Nice name for the registry key, 'isPlainTextHonoured'. You'd think it was
optional to display plain text as plain text.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Question: What is the "right" (tm) way to access Freenet config file
options (such as servlet bind-ports) from a Servlet?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/
Chief Technology Offic
Hi!
I found a testsuite for users. You can install it on the project server, if you think
it's useful.
http://entropymine.com/jason/testbed/mime/
The link to the testsuite on the project server or to this URL can you include to the
FProxy gateway.
The user can check his browser himself. If h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 07 September 2002 23:47, Dan Merillat wrote:
<>
> Here's the anonymity risks:
>
> 1) Image/somethingwedontrecognize <-- IE, netscape like to load "plugins"
> for things it dosn't recognize. Someone could compromise the download
> server
t; devl at freenetproject.org
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Matthew Toseland
mtoseland at blueyonder.co.uk
amphibian at sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/551a5286/attachment.pgp>
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/b6163738/attachment.pgp>
>From Oskar Sandberg
>Have you checked that you haven't actually made the MessageStoreSize
>25000? Because other nodes (Hawk) show the liveChains staying right on
>the limit (as it should).
>
Bleah. My config file does indeed have a messageStoreSize of 5. It also
has a "%messageStoreSize=
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/d186cd66/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 01:34:30AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
>
> Borked. You've got the port numbers hardcoded, not using the config file.
> When I change them in the config, I get directed to a "Connection Refused"
> page. Not exactly what I was looking for.
I will fix this today.
Ian.
--
>From Oskar Sandberg
>On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
>> The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound,
>> i've got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it appears
>> freenet.node.states.request.RequestDone objects never get deleted, I
imagine
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Its just windows media files that I know of. MPEG files are safe unless
> its really a windows media file renamed to a .mpg extention.
Well mpeg is a quite flexible format, you can stuff a lot in there. If
winamp decided to interpret the content of a special chunk as
>From Ian Clarke
>java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound, i've
got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it appears
freenet.node.states.request.RequestDone objects never get deleted, I imagine
the two are r
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 09:43:41AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
<>
> Bleah. My config file does indeed have a messageStoreSize of 5. It also
> has a "%messageStoreSize=1000" line, which is a bit confusing... but anyway,
> it appears that the Windows installer comes with its own set defau
>From Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Have you checked that you haven't actually made the MessageStoreSize
>25000? Because other nodes (Hawk) show the liveChains staying right on
>the limit (as it should).
>
Bleah. My config file does indeed have a messageStoreSize of 5. It also
has a
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:53:28AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >> The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound,
> >> i've got ~25000 in it after 36h, also,
>From Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
>> The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound,
>> i've got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it appears
>> freenet.node.states.request.RequestDone objects never get d
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
>
> The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound, i've
> got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it app
>From Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
The ticketTable in StandardMessageHandler appears to grow without bound, i've
got ~25000 in it after 36h, also, it appears
freenet.node.states.request.RequestDone objects never get deleted, I im
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
>
> > Or just replace < and > with one of these set of similar looking characters
> > (I think the last 2 are non-Unicode characters which can be shown in most
> > browsers without prompting to download silly extra packs) ??»«
>
>
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:00:51AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
>
> Matthew Toseland writes:
> >
> > Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion of announcements (within
> > the node). Build 501 largely fixed this. Build 502 fixed another nasty.
> > Build 503 will be out later today, and will fix
Borked. You've got the port numbers hardcoded, not using the config file.
When I change them in the config, I get directed to a "Connection Refused"
page. Not exactly what I was looking for.
--Dan
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http
Robert Bihlmeyer writes:
> Honing of the parsing code will be appreciated. One more question to
> the Freenet experts: this thing is being called both from fproxy (where
> logging is good) and from fclient (where logging seems to go nowhere).
Please tell me you're poplating the known-types, rath
Matthew Toseland writes:
>
> --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> The resident non-coding freenet pontif said recently:
> "
> As this freesite is designed for a general audience I am unable
Ian Clarke writes:
>
> We either need to raise people from the dead to come back and document=20
> their code properly - so that it can be picked up by others when they=20
> need to - we document it ourselves if we can figure it out - or we=20
> replace it with properly documented code.
__
> Or just replace < and > with one of these set of similar looking characters
> (I think the last 2 are non-Unicode characters which can be shown in most
> browsers without prompting to download silly extra packs)
Like < and >, perhaps?
It dosn't matter, though. IE is going to second-g
scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/5cc9b35f/attachment.pgp>
rubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020908/ff37a48e/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland writes:
> Just allow access to : AND :8890. The code does not make it
> absolute, it takes the hostname from the query.
Let's see. I access via http://free/
It redirects me to http://:8890/
--Dan
___
devl mailing list
devl at
Dan Merillat writes:
> > Perhaps time for another round of heap-dumps.
>
> Is there a page on the wikki about how to do that on various JVMs?
I'm stupid and I don't read all the messages before replying.
--Dan
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetpr
Matthew Toseland writes:
> > I think desired behavior would be something like the way browsers treat
> > SSL pages - warning whenever it is loads a page besides the current. This
> > would require a plugin, but it can't be hard (I even think an old IE
> > plugin did it some time the past).
> What
Matthew Toseland writes:
>
> Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion of announcements (within
> the node). Build 501 largely fixed this. Build 502 fixed another nasty.
> Build 503 will be out later today, and will fix the remaining behaviour.
... I'm going to agree with Ian on this one: bui
79 matches
Mail list logo
