-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I will be making updates to this branch that will not compile. There
are all incremental updates for my own effort's sake.
Use branch fcp_0_4_7 for the stable version.
- --
Jay Oliveri "In the land of the blind,
G
On Thursday 03 October 2002 13:57 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:29:40PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> > "serapis" is now alive and well, crontab'ed and all, lurking in
> > #freenet. It can be taught by anyone (not restricted) and has the
> > basic modules loaded. He's ru
On Matthew's request, I have announced Freenet 0.5pre1 - the first 0.5
candidate release.
Go... download... submit bugs.
Top priority right now (in addition to searching for and fixing any bugs
in 0.5pre1) is getting the Windows installer/tray-app up to speed with
recent changes.
I have had
> >> > On the gripping hand, one could put extra menu items on the rabbit
> >> > in the tray.
> >> One could do WHAT? You evil, stinkin' Windoze using Motie!
> >
> >you know, people fucking wonder why everyone is fucking hostile to
> >freenet. And then you say shit like this.
> >
> >Fuck you. Ki
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:52:36AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >So, if you think you have a really good reason why we shouldn't bump the
> >version to 0.5 when the native datastore has proven itself, speak now or
> >forever hold your peace.
> >
> >Ian.
>
> The windows configurator overrides t
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>
>On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
>> > On the gripping hand, one could put extra menu items on the rabbit
>> > in the tray.
>> One could do WHAT? You evil, stinkin' Windoze using Motie!
>
>you know, people fucking
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:25:06PM +0200, the bishop wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> I ran into problems since build 507, but with build 510, my node refuses to
> work at all. When i use the Blackdown runtime (1.3.1) or Sun's Java
> (1.4.0-b92), the node works fine.
> (on Linux/x86 2.4.19)
Hmm. That's b
Please upgrade to 511. Features bugfixes, and the implementation of the
LRU list as a doubly linked list of NativeBuffers, practical upshot is
another source of bugs (in the form of DirectoryExceptions which will be
generated by verifyList() as it is called to do spot checks), and a
substantial sp
Hi Folks!
I ran into problems since build 507, but with build 510, my node refuses to
work at all. When i use the Blackdown runtime (1.3.1) or Sun's Java
(1.4.0-b92), the node works fine.
(on Linux/x86 2.4.19)
Starting a fresh node with kaffe is ok, but at the first request with fproxy
or fcp
>Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>So, if you think you have a really good reason why we shouldn't bump the
>version to 0.5 when the native datastore has proven itself, speak now or
>forever hold your peace.
>
>Ian.
The windows configurator overrides the freenet.ini defaults with horribly
broken
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:59:08PM +1000, fish wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > > On the gripping hand, one could put extra menu items on the rabbit
> > > in the tray.
> > One could do WHAT? You evil, stinkin' Windoze using Motie!
>
> you know, people fucking wond
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On the gripping hand, one could put extra menu items on the rabbit
> > in the tray.
> One could do WHAT? You evil, stinkin' Windoze using Motie!
you know, people fucking wonder why everyone is fucking hostile to
freenet. And then you say shit li
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:54:10AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Benjamin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > anyway... is it possible to configure your node to have only
> > retrieval/insertion accessable to the outside?
>
> Ironically, that's how Freenet worked back in the "old days" (bu
At 07.31 04/10/02 -0400, you wrote:
>On the other hand ssh tunnels work fine. There is a good windows ssh client called
>pussh. Just forward the ports you need and all is well.
. from an internet cafe ?
Anyway 510 works via ssl 8)
Thx. Ciao. Marco
--
* Marco A. Calamari [EMAIL PR
On the other hand ssh tunnels work fine. There is a good windows ssh client called
pussh. Just forward the ports you need and all is well.
Ed Tomlinson
On October 4, 2002 03:08 am, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
> At 21.21 03/10/02 +0100, you wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> Just this; is fproxy usable via SS
Benjamin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> anyway... is it possible to configure your node to have only
> retrieval/insertion accessable to the outside?
Ironically, that's how Freenet worked back in the "old days" (build
499). It seems the developers are convinced that Freenet can and
will
>From Matthew Toseland
>No, sadly. Otherwise we could do useful things like "use 10% of
>available disk space, update dynamically".
If we had a way for freenet to reparse its config file or accept configuration
changes from the outside at runtime, we could have a standalone program (maybe
the
>From "Marco A. Calamari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'll be able to test 509 next week; i just suggest that, before
> the release of 0.5, this problem will be addressed, and optionally a warning
> message like that about Internet Explorer is added when people
> browse freenet using http AND are not on
At 09.08 04/10/02 +0200, you wrote:
...
>>Eh? People will run a node locally. If they don't run a permanent node
>>locally they have no security anyway. So what's the point of SSL?
>
>I was unable to well explain my point.
>
>Or maybe you was unable to understand it because, as most of
> freenet
19 matches
Mail list logo
