Simon Porter wrote:
> . Design and layout - something more welcoming and less dark
> Looking forward to your feedback
Using tables for layout suck, use CSS instead. Take for example
http://www.wired.com/ , all XHTML and CSS compliant, so it is possible
to use existing standards without hacks t
First of all, how do I change my mailing list subscription from daily
digest to normal. It is driving me mad.
As for active elements I am in agreement with the rest of you. When I
said collapsible I just meant done in HTML, so the relevant section is
expanded depending on what page you're on. Noth
Concerning the sneakernet issue:
The routing seems to be a problem. How does the sneakernet method exert
preference over which node it communicates with? That would have to be
dealt with, or shown to be irrelevant.
Also, there's a speed issue, for routing. Routing is based on human
networks
In reply to the above comments.
Ian's comments -
Design - The banner does indeed take up a lot of space. The current
design was slapped together in two seconds just to give a basic outline.
The banner size definitely won't be staying that size. Same with the
grey. It's just there because its the
Concerning the sneakernet issue:
The routing seems to be a problem. How does the sneakernet method exert
preference over which node it communicates with? That would have to be
dealt with, or shown to be irrelevant.
Also, there's a speed issue, for routing. Routing is based on human
networks
Looking forward to your feedback
I like the blue, that's pretty slick. But, the banner doesn't look right
to me. I think the "The Freenet Project" text, and the bunny, should be on
the top left corner. For one thing, this would take care the bunny's
backward-ness. "Hops" the bunny can do
>Looking forward to your feedback
I like the blue, that's pretty slick. But, the banner doesn't look right
to me. I think the "The Freenet Project" text, and the bunny, should be on
the top left corner. For one thing, this would take care the bunny's
backward-ness. "Hops" the bunny can do
I agree with Tyler, but for a different reason, we are encouraging people
onto a network where active content isn't possible due to security risks,
surely we should make an effort to show how good a site can be without
resorting to overused scripting tricks?
And as people are commenting on how the
Hi everyone,
Recently there has been the idea of redesigning the Freenet website
raised in this mailing list by Alabaster. I have teamed up with him to
give any help I can making a new redesigned website for the Freenet
project. Alabaster has kindly set up a temporary space for the site to
be work
Login using the URL at the bottom of emails to the list. You can
change it there.
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:56:33PM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> Although it is true that the list of people you mention is the kind of
> people that visit the sit I don't think it makes sense to organise the
> site around these users.
That wasn't my intention. I am simply saying that in evaluatin
Login using the URL at the bottom of emails to the list. You can
change it there.
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
t http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021215/8cd33932/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Wouldn't it be preferable to have a generic "GetNodeStatus" command which
> contained more general information, including EstimatedLoad?
Maybe, yes. But what other information needs to be returned? The only
things I can think of on the top of my head a
s.tar.gz
Type: application/x-gunzip
Size: 793 bytes
Desc:
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021215/23fc8f97/attachment.bin>
-- next part --
Index: src/freenet/node/Main.java
=
enetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021215/17020a18/attachment.pgp>
Hi all,
Following error when I start freenet, happened after using the snapshot today
(though it could have just been the restart that caused it?).
15-Dec-2002 14:42:56 (freenet.support.io.Bandwidth, main): new
Bandwidth(0,0,BOTH)
15-Dec-2002 14:42:56 (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node key
First of all, how do I change my mailing list subscription from daily
digest to normal. It is driving me mad.
As for active elements I am in agreement with the rest of you. When I
said collapsible I just meant done in HTML, so the relevant section is
expanded depending on what page you're on. Noth
In reply to the above comments.
Ian's comments -
Design - The banner does indeed take up a lot of space. The current
design was slapped together in two seconds just to give a basic outline.
The banner size definitely won't be staying that size. Same with the
grey. It's just there because its the
I tend to agree, I would greatly prefer a simple elegant site which
didn't try to use any whiz-bang features of the very latest browsers.
Another important issue to be considered is how easy it will be for
people to update the website. It is counter-productive for only one, or
a small number o
I tend to agree, I would greatly prefer a simple elegant site which
didn't try to use any whiz-bang features of the very latest browsers.
Another important issue to be considered is how easy it will be for
people to update the website. It is counter-productive for only one, or
a small number o
I agree with Tyler, but for a different reason, we are encouraging people
onto a network where active content isn't possible due to security risks,
surely we should make an effort to show how good a site can be without
resorting to overused scripting tricks?
And as people are commenting on how the
The only thing I can think of as a potential issue
will be browser compatibility. From the mockup:
This will be a collapsible menu with main headings
such as:
While having nifty features is fun PLEASE remember to
make the site comptabile with non-mainstream browsers.
In this case think about the
Simon Porter wrote:
. Design and layout - something more welcoming and less dark
Looking forward to your feedback
Using tables for layout suck, use CSS instead. Take for example
http://www.wired.com/ , all XHTML and CSS compliant, so it is possible
to use existing standards without hacks t
The only thing I can think of as a potential issue
will be browser compatibility. From the mockup:
This will be a collapsible menu with main headings
such as:
While having nifty features is fun PLEASE remember to
make the site comptabile with non-mainstream browsers.
In this case think about the
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 06:53:58PM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> http://freenet.winterfellstudios.net/
Looking good so-far! A couple of initial comments:
- The banner across the top takes up quite a lot of screen real-estate.
Could it be made smaller?
- I am not sure that the grey looks so
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 06:53:58PM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> http://freenet.winterfellstudios.net/
Looking good so-far! A couple of initial comments:
- The banner across the top takes up quite a lot of screen real-estate.
Could it be made smaller?
- I am not sure that the grey looks so
We used to have that feature, but it became more difficult to implement
when we switched to TWiki.
If you want to put in a page for it, and some code, I can wire something
up at this end which does something with I receive emails from Paypal
(they email me every time there is a donation with th
...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021215/6d72a7cd/attachment.pgp>
Ian Clarke writes:
> My point is, all we need to do is a search-replace on this patch, and we
> can *avoid* breaking backwards compatability in the future. Can you
> think of a good reason *not* to do it?
>
> Ian.
>
Nope. Does anyone object if I go ahead and do that s///, and then
check it i
Hi everyone,
Recently there has been the idea of redesigning the Freenet website
raised in this mailing list by Alabaster. I have teamed up with him to
give any help I can making a new redesigned website for the Freenet
project. Alabaster has kindly set up a temporary space for the site to
be work
Ian Clarke writes:
> Wouldn't it be preferable to have a generic "GetNodeStatus" command which
> contained more general information, including EstimatedLoad?
>
> Ian.
>
Probably, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't start with a command that
just gets the load. I guess you're arguing that this
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My point is, all we need to do is a search-replace on this patch, and we
> can *avoid* breaking backwards compatability in the future. Can you
> think of a good reason *not* to do it?
>
> Ian.
>
Nope. Does anyone object if I go ahead and do that s///,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:39:19AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> I guess you're arguing that this particular
> naming scheme will have to be changed to fit the more generic
> implementation, but we might as well test this simple command to see
> the usefulness/repurcussions of it before going all
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:39:19AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> I guess you're arguing that this particular
> naming scheme will have to be changed to fit the more generic
> implementation, but we might as well test this simple command to see
> the usefulness/repurcussions of it before going all
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouldn't it be preferable to have a generic "GetNodeStatus" command which
> contained more general information, including EstimatedLoad?
>
> Ian.
>
Probably, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't start with a command that
just gets the load. I guess you'r
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 05:32:26PM +1100, fish wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be preferable to have a generic "GetNodeStatus" command which
> > contained more general information, including EstimatedLoad?
>
> Maybe, yes. But what other information needs to
Hi all,
Following error when I start freenet, happened after using the snapshot today (though
it could have just been the restart that caused it?).
15-Dec-2002 14:42:56 (freenet.support.io.Bandwidth, main): new Bandwidth(0,0,BOTH)
15-Dec-2002 14:42:56 (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node keys
Who has control of the CVS mailinglist? SourceForge? Does anyone have
access to edit the script that generates the automatic e-mails from CVS
commits?
I would like to have the development branch tag, i.e. [freenet-CVS][0.5.0]
or [freenet-CVS][0.5.1], in the subject line of the email for easier
r
39 matches
Mail list logo
