[freenet-dev] Attempt to write past end of Bucket

2003-01-16 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Thursday 16 January 2003 20:52, you wrote: Could you send me a debug log file if you have one. If you have a simple example program that reproduces the problem that would be great too. Thanks. --gj > > Hello Freenetters > > I've been trying to FEC-encode a large (600MB) file via FCP usi

[freenet-dev] Re: Idea for bumping up known min good build for 0.5.1 release

2003-01-16 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Will Glynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Basically, we keep our current minimum and before we release, > > we set a date (say we released today, we'd set the date at > > the 29th of january) at which point the minimum build increases > > automatically to the new one

[freenet-dev] Attempt to write past end of Bucket

2003-01-16 Thread bdonlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 16 January 2003 08:52 pm, Chris Dennis wrote: > Hello Freenetters > > I've been trying to FEC-encode a large (600MB) file via FCP using build > 544 on my Linux box (Sun JRE 1.3.1, 96MB RAM). Previous attempts (with > older builds) caused "

[freenet-dev] patchish thingy

2003-01-16 Thread fish
hi. this is a patchish thingy that adds a stream requst servlet to fred, despite GJ's advice to not do that. I'd send a full patch, but it seems that cvs.freenet.sourceforge.net is dead, and since I have to go home from work,i'm just going to add the required changes to make this thing go. To Ma

[freenet-dev] Idea for bumping up known min good build for 0.5.1 release

2003-01-16 Thread bdonlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 16 January 2003 07:40 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:01:41PM -0500, bdonlan wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 January 2003 09:44 pm, Mathew Ryden wrote: > > > We can set a time limit for when the min known good build incr

Re: [freenet-dev] Attempt to write past end of Bucket

2003-01-16 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Thursday 16 January 2003 20:52, you wrote: Could you send me a debug log file if you have one. If you have a simple example program that reproduces the problem that would be great too. Thanks. --gj > > Hello Freenetters > > I've been trying to FEC-encode a large (600MB) file via FCP usi

[freenet-dev] Idea for bumping up known min good build for 0.5.1 release

2003-01-16 Thread bdonlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 15 January 2003 09:44 pm, Mathew Ryden wrote: > We can set a time limit for when the min known good build increases to the > build # of 0.5.1. Basically, we keep our current minimum and before we > release, we set a date (say we released t

Re: [freenet-dev] Attempt to write past end of Bucket

2003-01-16 Thread bdonlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 16 January 2003 08:52 pm, Chris Dennis wrote: > Hello Freenetters > > I've been trying to FEC-encode a large (600MB) file via FCP using build > 544 on my Linux box (Sun JRE 1.3.1, 96MB RAM). Previous attempts (with > older builds) caused "

[freenet-dev] Attempt to write past end of Bucket

2003-01-16 Thread Chris Dennis
Hello Freenetters I've been trying to FEC-encode a large (600MB) file via FCP using build 544 on my Linux box (Sun JRE 1.3.1, 96MB RAM). Previous attempts (with older builds) caused "out of memory" errors, but now I get an FCP response that says: Attempt to write past end of Bucket The

Re: [freenet-dev] Idea for bumping up known min good build for 0.5.1 release

2003-01-16 Thread bdonlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 16 January 2003 07:40 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:01:41PM -0500, bdonlan wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 January 2003 09:44 pm, Mathew Ryden wrote: > > > We can set a time limit for when the min known good build incr

Re: [freenet-dev] Idea for bumping up known min good build for 0.5.1 release

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:01:41PM -0500, bdonlan wrote: > On Wednesday 15 January 2003 09:44 pm, Mathew Ryden wrote: > > We can set a time limit for when the min known good build increases to the > > build # of 0.5.1. Basically, we keep our current minimum and before we > > release, we set a date

Re: [freenet-dev] Idea for bumping up known min good build for 0.5.1 release

2003-01-16 Thread bdonlan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 15 January 2003 09:44 pm, Mathew Ryden wrote: > We can set a time limit for when the min known good build increases to the > build # of 0.5.1. Basically, we keep our current minimum and before we > release, we set a date (say we released t

[freenet-dev] freenet web site update

2003-01-16 Thread Simon Porter
to taking less time. I'm happy to see Frost getting some attention again as well :) Keep up the good work ;) Simon Porter -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030116/0131a466/attachment.html>

[freenet-dev] Build 545 (stable)

2003-01-16 Thread GeckoX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When will this be available at http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar? Thanks. :GeckoX ++ 16/01/03 01:00 + - Matthew Toseland: >On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0500, bdonlan wrote: >> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 07:43 pm, M

[freenet-dev] Two mainport/fproxy issues

2003-01-16 Thread Dominic Anello
- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 882 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030116/3339a08f/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] freenet web site update

2003-01-16 Thread Simon Porter
Hey people   I seem to be receiving mailings OK again thanks to bdonlan.   I haven’t really been able to do much to the new tiki version of the Freenet website mainly because I’m suffering from RSI in my right arm. Doing everything with just my left hand is just too painfully slow to ge

Re: [freenet-dev] Build 545 (stable)

2003-01-16 Thread GeckoX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When will this be available at http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar? Thanks. :GeckoX ++ 16/01/03 01:00 + - Matthew Toseland: >On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0500, bdonlan wrote: >> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 07:43 pm, Ma

[freenet-dev] For few bits more from /.

2003-01-16 Thread Tuomas Lukinmaa
Slashdot reviewed a book (1) named Effective Java (2). I'm reporting it here as the book might be in some interest for freenet developers. Also browsing thru the spam known as replies, there was one very interesting note about Java source code scanner, PMD (3). Dunno if it's already being used,

Re: [freenet-dev] Two mainport/fproxy issues

2003-01-16 Thread Dominic Anello
On 2003-01-15 21:44:32 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:36:12PM -0500, Dominic Anello wrote: 8< > > The first is that I can't seem to be able to get mainport/fproxy to be > > consistently public. The mainport servlet is bound on 0.0.0.0:: > > > > [danello@gr

[freenet-dev] Build 545 (stable)

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030116/6368b423/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Distribution Node and email signatures

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
e: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030116/086193fd/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Bug in webinstaller?

2003-01-16 Thread Dave Hooper
Tried the most recent webinstaller for a laugh (it never worked particularly well for me), and when it said "Execute: NodeConfig.exe" I noticed that it didn't load NodeConfig at all, instead it launched freenet. At this point the installer hung. So I right clicked that rabbit and shut down freene

[freenet-dev] Build 545 (stable)

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
ail/devl/attachments/20030116/f7866f6d/attachment.pgp>