Seems you are not the first to be frustrated by this - this guy has some
code to fix it:
http://www.nutch.org/docs/api/net/nutch/net/ChannelInputStream.html
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coordinator, The Freenet Project htt
Seems you are not the first to be frustrated by this - this guy has some
code to fix it:
http://www.nutch.org/docs/api/net/nutch/net/ChannelInputStream.html
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke ian at locut.us
Coordinator, The Freenet Project http:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:09:44AM -0500, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> well, I discovered two huge bugs in the java.nio package. The first one
> I mailed to Matthew and it is that the read() reads bytes as signed
> octets even though in the javadocs it explicitly says the values
> InputStream.read
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:09:44AM -0500, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> well, I discovered two huge bugs in the java.nio package. The first one
> I mailed to Matthew and it is that the read() reads bytes as signed
> octets even though in the javadocs it explicitly says the values
> InputStream.read
well, I discovered two huge bugs in the java.nio package. The first one
I mailed to Matthew and it is that the read() reads bytes as signed
octets even though in the javadocs it explicitly says the values
InputStream.read() returns ranges 0-255. So for example 0xfb is -5, not
251. This will
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:08:31 -0800 Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We need to get probabilistic caching in the code ASAP - the current
> >level of load most nodes are getting is totally disrupting the
> >clustering effect from what I have s
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 palomitas at hushmail.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:08:31 -0800 Ian Clarke wrote:
> >We need to get probabilistic caching in the code ASAP - the current
> >level of load most nodes are getting is totally disrupting the
> >clustering effect from what I have seen in my n
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:55:19 -0800 Matthew Toseland
wrote:
>> I vote that the nodes can do that weighting towards smaller keys.
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> Advantage: I (as a node owner) can place a little emphasis on
>> "content" (html, txt, images, freesites, ...) and delete
>> "warez" ;) (isos, DVD-rip
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:55:19 -0800 Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I vote that the nodes can do that weighting towards smaller keys.
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> Advantage: I (as a node owner) can place a little emphasis on
>> "content" (html, txt, images, freesites, ...) and delete
>> "warez
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:52:51 -0800 fillament at iipmail.net wrote:
>Just had an idea that could work as an optional client but would
>be better as part of fproxy for new users. I keep seeing messages
>on the dev list about "windows users should update". [SNIP]
I vote for an inline frame at the to
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:52:51 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Just had an idea that could work as an optional client but would
>be better as part of fproxy for new users. I keep seeing messages
>on the dev list about "windows users should update". [SNIP]
I vote for an inline frame at the top of th
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:08:31 -0800 Ian Clarke wrote:
>We need to get probabilistic caching in the code ASAP - the current
>level of load most nodes are getting is totally disrupting the
>clustering effect from what I have seen in my node's diagnostics.
>[snip]
>
>I propose making this the highest
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:08:31 -0800 Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We need to get probabilistic caching in the code ASAP - the current
>level of load most nodes are getting is totally disrupting the
>clustering effect from what I have seen in my node's diagnostics.
>[snip]
>
>I propose maki
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:08:31 -0800 Ian Clarke wrote:
>We need to get probabilistic caching in the code ASAP [snip]
>
>I propose making this the highest priority at this time.
I think the highest priority should have the correction of the "CANNOT
RENAME NODE FILE" bug.
Currently every Windows mac
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:08:31 -0800 Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We need to get probabilistic caching in the code ASAP [snip]
>
>I propose making this the highest priority at this time.
I think the highest priority should have the correction of the "CANNOT
RENAME NODE FILE" bug.
Currentl
On March 27, 2003 11:57 pm, Pascal wrote:
> Adding useDSIndex=false to your config file will significantly reduce
> your CPU load. This will have two side effects however:
This _does_ seem to be helping here. Freenet load is less noticealbe
with this option.
May I suggest that it be modified s
On March 27, 2003 11:57 pm, Pascal wrote:
> Adding useDSIndex=false to your config file will significantly reduce
> your CPU load. This will have two side effects however:
This _does_ seem to be helping here. Freenet load is less noticealbe
with this option.
May I suggest that it be modified s
17 matches
Mail list logo
