[freenet-dev] Portability issues: integer ++ atomicity?

, we can't do it. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030516/a70f71b4/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

On May 16, 2003 02:46 pm, Toad wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:10:57AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:15:49AM +0100, Toad wrote: > > > Observe > > >

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

entries: 100 Global mean traffic (queries per hour):3321.92224 Local mean traffic (queries per hour): 689.6485665846112 Current advertise probability: 0.15754031587654324 Current proportion of requests being accepted: 0.99 This is what I expect to see. I have out going bandwidth

[freenet-dev] TUK (redux)

On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 14:50, Toad wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 05:03:22AM +, jrandom wrote: > > Ok, lots of chatting on IRC today about updatable keys, spawned by > > " we must do something about this silly edition site prejudice" > > Almost two hours later, I think we've got something. >

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Toad wrote: > Or alternatively, > > http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/version_histogram.txt > > :))) > > > > (My apologies for the *horrible* perl -- it's not my best language.) > > Anyway, this shows that out of the 100 nodes in my routing

[freenet-dev] TUK (redux)

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 05:03:22AM +, jrandom wrote: > Ok, lots of chatting on IRC today about updatable keys, spawned by > " we must do something about this silly edition site prejudice" > Almost two hours later, I think we've got something. > > Proposal: > Add a new key type that supports

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:10:57AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:15:49AM +0100, Toad wrote: > > Observe > > http://127.0.0.1:7888/servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/incomingHopsSinceReset/hour > > > > Mine shows nothing over

[freenet-dev] Re: Profiling of fred

Damn, I sent this mail to myself instead of to devl.. Another try then.. sorry for loosing the formatting. The attachements I am talking about can be retrieved from http://194.236.28.174/freenetstuff/prof.zip /N - Original Message - From: "Niklas Bergh" To:

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:45:48PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Toad (toad at amphibian.dyndns.org) wrote: > > > http://127.0.0.1:7888/servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/incomingHopsSinceReset/hour > > > > Mine shows nothing over 1.94, many under 1. > > > > Hence, pcaching is not working,

[freenet-dev] new lightweight FProxy theme (was: graphics overload!)

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:48PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > I noticed something that's relevant to the earlier discussion about > caching images and so forth. It appears that even when mozilla > caches the images, it doesn't *use* the cache if all the connections > are used up. Most

[freenet-dev] Node specialization vs. attack on specific content

On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 23:01, Toad wrote: > > Nice in theory, but in practice, how do you distribute the new > formulas? I've been thinking this week about a simpler problem: a network of nodes which provide the service of distributed storage and distribution of fixed length chunks of say 1

[freenet-dev] re: TUK (redux)

So as soon as I got home last night I remembered something. What may be helpful is that perhaps the content at the TUK contains both an expected update date as well as the content previously discussed. This way, if a TUK is retrieved after only a few hops, but the expected update date has not

[freenet-dev] new lightweight FProxy theme (was: graphics overload!)

formational tag saying what the meatspace size would be. --Dan -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 155 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030516/fdc48b24/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

At 00.10 16/05/2003 -0700, you wrote: >> Hence, pcaching is not working, presumably because there are too many old >> nodes on the network. Hence, pcaching is not responsible for the current >> problems! So upgrade already! > >Well, we don't need to infer how many old nodes are on the network,

[freenet-dev] Invalid local QPH value using v593

> > Global mean traffic (queries per hour):3298.35554 > > Local mean traffic (queries per hour): -16755.876192692576 > > Current advertise probability: 0.02 > > Did you reset your clock while the node was running? Hmm.. I am using ntp for the clock so I guess that is possible. Now when

[freenet-dev] Invalid local QPH value using v593

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 07:32:21AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > This doesn't look right. > > Global mean traffic (queries per hour):3298.35554 > Local mean traffic (queries per hour): -16755.876192692576 > Current advertise probability: 0.02 Did you reset your clock while the node was

[freenet-dev] Invalid local QPH value using v593

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 07:32:21AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > This doesn't look right. > > Global mean traffic (queries per hour):3298.35554 > Local mean traffic (queries per hour): -16755.876192692576 > Current advertise probability: 0.02 Eeek. Is this repeatable? > > /N

[freenet-dev] Something not right with overload measurement

On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 01:41:22AM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: > This seen on 593, been running for 3 days, 7 hours, 25 mins when I noticed: > > Global mean traffic (queries per hour):4735.7334 > Local mean traffic (queries per hour): 1367.4226741469752 > Current advertise probability: 0.02

[freenet-dev] SocketException & no ARKs inserted

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:54:55AM -0700, palomitas at hushmail.com wrote: > > 1.) My log if full of those exceptions: > > .mm.dd hh:mm:nn (freenet.interfaces.servlet.MultipleHttpServletContainer, > QThread-##, NORMAL): I/O error in servlet > java.net.SocketException: Software caused

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

Observe http://127.0.0.1:7888/servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/incomingHopsSinceReset/hour Mine shows nothing over 1.94, many under 1. Hence, pcaching is not working, presumably because there are too many old nodes on the network. Hence, pcaching is not responsible for the current problems! So

[freenet-dev] TUK (redux)

Ok, lots of chatting on IRC today about updatable keys, spawned by " we must do something about this silly edition site prejudice" Almost two hours later, I think we've got something. Proposal: Add a new key type that supports secure sites that: - are like edition sites that can be bookmarked -

[freenet-dev] Pcaching, or lack thereof...

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: msg.pgp URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030516/dec4730b/attachment.ksh>