While we're on the topic of IP detecting:
I've routed my Freenet node through a NAT
(masquerading), so I have an internal LAN address,
with an appropriate return port that gets routed back
to me. However, rather than defining it myself
whenever my IP changes, or running some kind of
dynamic DNS, a
This was discussed before, you can check the devl archives. The
conclusion then seemed to be "it isn't worth the hassle" which I thought
was strange-- the original complaint was by someone (I forget who) whose
external IP changes daily, if not more often.
I tried to point out that it's more hassle
>> What I really meant with my suggestion was that if fred encounters two
>> or
>> more, accrording to whatever filtering scheme used, valid IP addresses
>> then
>> why can't it just have a check to see if one of those addresses are the
>> one
>> currently in use and in that case continue using it.
> IP) of which of the valid addresses to use.
>
>0.0.0.0 IS NOT A VALID IP ADDRESS.
Well, that I agree with, but where did that address come from?
In my problem situation the address was 5.0.1.0
00- was the mac address of the same interface.
/N
___
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> >Also, does Fred check for reserved address ranges? It seems this would
> >be able to rule out most publicly inaccessible interfaces.
> That I know it does :)
Not all of them apparantly, 5.0.0.0/8 is marked IANA RESERVED.
--
Frank
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:39:44 -0500
>Also, does Fred check for reserved address ranges? It seems this would
>be able to rule out most publicly inaccessible interfaces.
>
That I know it does :)
/N
___
>> Would it be too much to ask that fred, when it scans through all of the
>> computers available interfaces, at least tries to stay with the interface
>> that can be found in the 'node' file if it still is present in the system
>> (even if a new interface or two have appeared).
>
>Fred iterates th
p-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/dbab6094/attachment.pgp>
ext attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/ff40b666/attachment.pgp>
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: msg.pgp
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/a904d0e7/attachment.ksh>
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/1d5efbe6/attachment.pgp>
e: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/c764284b/attachment.pgp>
t; > /N
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > devl mailing list
> > devl at freenetproject.org
> > http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> >
>
> --
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/a40bc850/attachment.pgp>
Scott
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/dd31e5b1/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> >Also, does Fred check for reserved address ranges? It seems this would
> >be able to rule out most publicly inaccessible interfaces.
> That I know it does :)
Not all of them apparantly, 5.0.0.0/8 is marked IANA RESERVED.
--
Frank
From: scgmi...@freenetproject.org
Reply-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:39:44 -0500
>Also, does Fred check for reserved address ranges? It seems this would
>be able to rule out most publicly inaccessible interfaces.
>
That I know it does :)
/N
16 matches
Mail list logo
