After about an hour of running 5005 I get:
"Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 2 in queue, 1427 millis since enqueued
last item, 20581 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug.
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel."
I am running Sun 1.4.2 on Linux 2.4.21.
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Stefan Majewski wrote:
>
> I have not experienced this with ClientPuts, only with FECEncodeSegment
> Commands so far. First I thought it was because I ommited the
> MetadataLength field in the Command, which is by the way not in the
> Documentation, Fro
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:05:42PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> Freenet stable build 5005 is now available. Major changes from 5003:
> * Detect windows 9X, and limit connections accordingly
> * Handle an error that windows 9X can cause in NIO
> * Increase the default splitfile download threads to 30
>
> W
Freenet stable build 5005 is now available. Major changes from 5003:
* Detect windows 9X, and limit connections accordingly
* Handle an error that windows 9X can cause in NIO
* Increase the default splitfile download threads to 30
We need people running Win9X (95, 98, 98SE, ME) to test it and tell
Devl Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
> freenet 14386 0.0 32.0 474648 164824 pts/2 SN 21:20 0:00 java -Xmx192m
> freenet.node.Main
> top:
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> 149
Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> irta:
> Devl Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> What java command are you using to run it?
>
> When the OOM occurs, what does "ps auxw" show for the memory use
> of the java process?
For the memory, it is really weird:
ps:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RS
Devl Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> $ ulimit -a
> core file size(blocks, -c) 0
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited
> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
> open files
In bish.lists.freenet.devel, you wrote:
> I'm stuck at 598 for the forseeable future. I'm running kaffe
> on FBSD and have been totally unable to get any of the other
> jvms to compile and work.
I'm using Sun JDK 1.4.1p3 on FreeBSD 5.1 with no problem
> I realize you can't keep supporting the
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Devl Peter wrote:
>
> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
>
> What does "ulimit -a" say, in the same shell from which you ran
> Freenet? I had to bump up my virtual memory limit over and above
$ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) u
What version of the node are you using? Neither I nor zab (co-author of
the fred NIO code and de facto Frost maintainer) can reproduce such
problems on the current code...
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:24:20PM +1000, fish wrote:
> FCP Bulk transfers are giving me incredible amounts of grief in both s
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:50:23PM -0400, Ken T Takusagawa wrote:
> > and the freenet.log has
> > gone out of control and filled my disk a couple of times, this actually puts
>
> A simple (stop-gap) way of preventing (well, slowing) disk
> filling might be to write the log to
> java.util.zip.GZIPO
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:16:27PM -0700, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
>
> --On Friday, July 04, 2003 10:09 PM -0400 Nicholas Sturm
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Sounds great! Does it run on any machine the audience is using?
> >Your description and the recent chatter would seem to suggest nothin
Hi,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, fish wrote:
> FCP Bulk transfers are giving me incredible amounts of grief in both stable and
> unstable right now, and I'm clueless as to why.
So am I. Started to develop my own FCP-Libabry a while ago, for the mere
testing. But got stuck with the same problems you are
--On Friday, July 04, 2003 10:09 PM -0400 Nicholas Sturm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds great! Does it run on any machine the audience is using?
Your description and the recent chatter would seem to suggest nothing
past 598 is working.
I have to agree. You seem to have taken one step forward
Sounds great! Does it run on any machine the audience is using? Your
description and the recent chatter would seem to suggest nothing past 598
is working.
> [Original Message]
> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 7/4/2003 8:26:40 PM
> Sub
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:04:30AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I'm going to keep reiterating the concerns of myself, jrand0m, and many
> others until something is done about them. (Some of these might just be mine,
> however. I speak for myself right now.)
>
> Freenet will not work in
> and the freenet.log has
> gone out of control and filled my disk a couple of times, this actually puts
A simple (stop-gap) way of preventing (well, slowing) disk
filling might be to write the log to
java.util.zip.GZIPOutputStream.
An even simpler way (for unix) would be to write the log to
stdo
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 03:58:24AM +0200, Frank v Waveren wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 07:42:27PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > Somebody decided that it would be very nice if the limits actually
> > WORKED. Sticking your fingers in your ears and your head in the sand is
> > no better than NOT HAVING A
Dude. I really wish you'd quote what you're replying to.
-todd
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That certainly doesn't look good.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" schrieb:
>
> # Unknown parameters - these are not yet known or handled by the NodeConfig
> # utility, but are assumed to be valid and understandable to the node
> # if you see this in the file, then please email the parameters following
> # this comment header to [EMAIL PROTECT
Thank you for this. Your explanation makes things clear.
-todd
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> NG is really quite simple. What it does is attempt to find the route that will
> respond fastest for a given key. It does this by tracking how long various
> events take.
>
> The curre
Devl Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
What does "ulimit -a" say, in the same shell from which you ran
Freenet? I had to bump up my virtual memory limit over and above
what I allow for my own personal account (to prevent mozilla from
killing my entire machine when it
I am getting the following exception each time something arrives from Freenet. I have
java memory set up to 192 mbyte, and it is not even close using it up.
(freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, read interface thread, NORMAL): Unexpected
throwable reading data for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: java.lang.O
On Saturday 05 July 2003 05:30 am, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Not freenet content, we are talking fred content and fred content shouldn't
> be illegal anywhere. If it where then the developers would probably be in
> deep shit.
But the browser caches both.
--
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing soun
Ok, I'm going to keep reiterating the concerns of myself, jrand0m, and many others until something is done about them. (Some of these might just be mine, however. I speak for myself right now.)
Freenet will not work in a hostile environment currently, because it's busy being prettified for our com
That certainly doesn't look good.
>I've requested on the network, perhaps this is a
>new experiment to help law enforcement more easily determine what you've
been
>doing with Freenet, part of it's new "user friendliness".
I cannot see how this makes something more userfriendly. Please explain.
It places something in the log say
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 02:15:33AM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> > I don't think Toesland's stupid and he's obviously working his ass off
for
> > this thing but that's pretty stupid(he's actually blaming a web browser
for
> > shitty Freenet behavior!), Freenet should be made to work with *no
brow
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 02:15:33AM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> I don't think Toesland's stupid and he's obviously working his ass off for
> this thing but that's pretty stupid(he's actually blaming a web browser for
> shitty Freenet behavior!), Freenet should be made to work with *no browser
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
