[freenet-dev] Re: Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jerome Flesch
Le Lundi 12 Juin 2006 19:32, Jusa Saari a ?crit?: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: > >> Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working just > >> fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ? > > > > It works only under Windows. And no, Wine is *not* a solution, because it

[freenet-dev] Re: Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jusa Saari
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: >> Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working just >> fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ? >> > It works only under Windows. And no, Wine is *not* a solution, because it > works only on Linux 32bits, and so Mac OS[X] users and

[freenet-dev] ARKs

2006-06-12 Thread David Sowder (Zothar)
Jusa Saari wrote: > Why does Freenet request ARKs from people I'm currently connected to ? If > I'm connected to them, then I already know their IP address, and if I need > to know any more information about them, I can simply ask them directly, > can't I ? > > See, the Darknet page says: > > > CON

[freenet-dev] Load Balancing, Tit for Tat, Fully utilizing nodes, etc?

2006-06-12 Thread Michael Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland wrote: > It seems like premature > optimization to me, lets get the basics right first. Fair point - forget about calculating the receiver windows. Let's go back to the previous idea of incrementing one of the receiver windows (in rou

[freenet-dev] Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jerome Flesch
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:18:27 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: > > I would like to know if some of you have an idea for the name of the > > fuqid replacement. I would prefer something not suggesting too much > > "traditional filesharing" or copyright infringment, and, if possible, not > > containing "f

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jerome Flesch
Le Lundi 12 Juin 2006 19:32, Jusa Saari a écrit : > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: > >> Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working just > >> fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ? > > > > It works only under Windows. And no, Wine is *not* a solution, because it

[freenet-dev] ARKs

2006-06-12 Thread Jusa Saari
Why does Freenet request ARKs from people I'm currently connected to ? If I'm connected to them, then I already know their IP address, and if I need to know any more information about them, I can simply ask them directly, can't I ? See, the Darknet page says: CONNECTED* * Requesting ARK And t

Re: [freenet-dev] ARKs

2006-06-12 Thread David Sowder (Zothar)
Jusa Saari wrote: Why does Freenet request ARKs from people I'm currently connected to ? If I'm connected to them, then I already know their IP address, and if I need to know any more information about them, I can simply ask them directly, can't I ? See, the Darknet page says: CONNECTED* * Re

[freenet-dev] Re: Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jusa Saari
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: >> Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working just >> fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ? >> > It works only under Windows. And no, Wine is *not* a solution, because it > works only on Linux 32bits, and so Mac OS[X] users and

[freenet-dev] Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jusa Saari
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:18:27 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: > I would like to know if some of you have an idea for the name of the fuqid > replacement. I would prefer something not suggesting too much "traditional > filesharing" or copyright infringment, and, if possible, not containing > "fuqid". S

[freenet-dev] The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Volodya
>> How about 'Blizzard'? implying fast and intense. >> > "Blizzard" sounds good, but it's a well-know trademark (see > http://www.blizzard.com/ ). http://www.freenet.co.uk/ q;-/ -- Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread! http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Fre

Re: [freenet-dev] Load Balancing, Tit for Tat, Fully utilizing nodes, etc?

2006-06-12 Thread Michael Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland wrote: > It seems like premature > optimization to me, lets get the basics right first. Fair point - forget about calculating the receiver windows. Let's go back to the previous idea of incrementing one of the receiver windows (in rou

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jerome Flesch
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:18:27 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: > > I would like to know if some of you have an idea for the name of the > > fuqid replacement. I would prefer something not suggesting too much > > "traditional filesharing" or copyright infringment, and, if possible, not > > containing "f

Re: [freenet-dev] The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Volodya
How about 'Blizzard'? implying fast and intense. "Blizzard" sounds good, but it's a well-know trademark (see http://www.blizzard.com/ ). http://www.freenet.co.uk/ q;-/ -- Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread! http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Ra

[freenet-dev] ARKs

2006-06-12 Thread Jusa Saari
Why does Freenet request ARKs from people I'm currently connected to ? If I'm connected to them, then I already know their IP address, and if I need to know any more information about them, I can simply ask them directly, can't I ? See, the Darknet page says: CONNECTED* * Requesting ARK And t

[freenet-dev] Re: The name of the fuqid replacement

2006-06-12 Thread Jusa Saari
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:18:27 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote: > I would like to know if some of you have an idea for the name of the fuqid > replacement. I would prefer something not suggesting too much "traditional > filesharing" or copyright infringment, and, if possible, not containing > "fuqid". S