default)
Yes. Opennet is such a hideous security risk that we should definitely ask the
user, with no obvious default.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<ht
* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 21:58:28]:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> > > I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
> >
> > Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
> > that someone (you
ect.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
>
--
Founder and CEO, Thoof Inc
Email: ian at thoof.com
Office: +1 512 524 8934 x 100
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
AIM: ian.clarke at mac.com
Skype: sanity
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070719/b6796a60/attachment.html>
* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
that someone (you in particular) objects here :)
> Can't we explicitly ask the user a yes/no, maybe during the post-setup wizard?
I have no objection to asking the user, provided that it is clearly apparent
to users that unless you know people already running Freenet, you need to go
with opennet or Freenet will be useless to you.
I'm all for letting users make an informed choice, but I'm certainly not in
favor of corralling
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 21:58:28]:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> > > I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
> >
> > Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm r
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> > I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
>
> Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
> that someone (you in particular) objects here :)
>
> >
available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070719/efbfa638/attachment.pgp>
___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070719/9f28c890/attachment.pgp>
gt; Property changes on:
> trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_opennet.sh
> ___ Name:
> svn:executable
>+ *
>
> Added: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/bin/install_opennet.cmd
> ==
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
that someone (you in particular) objects here :)
> Can't we explicitly ask the user a yes/no, maybe during the
Freenet 0.7 build 1047 is available. Please upgrade ASAP. This build includes
various fixes to opennet and to probe requests, as well as further work on
unit testing by sback. Thanks to saces, nextgens, sback and me. You might
want to update your UPnP plugin too. 1046 was skipped because I accid
Most likely a LAN problem. You need to go to advanced mode, enable
includeLocalAddresses, and for each peer on each node, enable
allowLocalAddresses in the dropdown at the bottom of the darknet peers list.
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 19:46, Robert Hailey wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Matth
I'm not convinced it should just be a default. Can't we explicitly ask the
user a yes/no, maybe during the post-setup wizard?
On Thursday 19 July 2007 01:16, you wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2007-07-19 00:16:16 + (Thu, 19 Jul 2007)
> New Revision: 14189
>
> Added:
>trunk/apps/new_ins
14 matches
Mail list logo
